• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

滴鼻咪达唑仑在镇静后产生遗忘效果方面优于口服羟嗪:一项初步研究。

Intranasal midazolam better at effecting amnesia after sedation than oral hydroxyzine: a pilot study.

作者信息

Kupietzky A, Holan G, Shapira J

机构信息

Hebrew University--Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):32-4.

PMID:8668567
Abstract

Providing amnesia about a surgery is a desired side effect of a medication. This study compares anterograde amnesic effects of midazolam with hydroxyzine in children undergoing dental treatment with those drugs plus nitrous oxide, using a recall test. Thirty ASAI children 24-28 months, were shown a Standard-Binet intelligence scale-memory for objects subtest before entering treatment room. Twenty-lone randomly determined children received 3.7 mg/kg hydroxyzine 45 min before treatment or 0.2 mg/kg intranasal midazolam in two succeeding appointments, alternatively. Recall in the 30-subject treatment group was 90%. Recall in the 21-subject treatment group was 71% for hydroxyzine and 29% for midazolam. Midazolam was more effective in creating amnesia than hydroxyzine in this study.

摘要

产生手术失忆是一种药物期望的副作用。本研究采用回忆测试,比较了咪达唑仑与羟嗪在接受牙科治疗的儿童中与一氧化二氮联合使用时的顺行性遗忘效果。30名24至28个月大的ASA I级儿童在进入治疗室前接受了标准比内智力量表物体记忆子测试。21名随机确定的儿童在治疗前45分钟接受3.7毫克/千克羟嗪,或在两次连续预约中交替接受0.2毫克/千克鼻内咪达唑仑。30名受试者治疗组的回忆率为90%。21名受试者治疗组中,羟嗪的回忆率为71%,咪达唑仑的回忆率为29%。在本研究中,咪达唑仑在产生失忆方面比羟嗪更有效。

相似文献

1
Intranasal midazolam better at effecting amnesia after sedation than oral hydroxyzine: a pilot study.滴鼻咪达唑仑在镇静后产生遗忘效果方面优于口服羟嗪:一项初步研究。
Pediatr Dent. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):32-4.
2
Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients.口服咪达唑仑联合与不联合羟嗪用于儿科牙科患者镇静的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;26(6):492-6.
3
The effectiveness of midazolam and hydroxyzine as sedative agents for young pediatric dental patients.咪达唑仑和羟嗪作为小儿牙科患者镇静剂的有效性。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1996 Nov-Dec;63(6):421-5.
4
Comparison of oral midazolam with a combination of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation in the effectiveness of dental sedation for young children.口服咪达唑仑与口服咪达唑仑联合一氧化二氮-氧气吸入用于幼儿牙科镇静效果的比较。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):9-16. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.50810.
5
The safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam sedation combined with inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen in paediatric dental patients as an alternative to general anaesthesia.鼻内咪达唑仑镇静联合一氧化二氮与氧气吸入镇静在儿科牙科患者中作为全身麻醉替代方法的安全性和有效性。
SAAD Dig. 2010 Jan;26:12-22.
6
Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.水合氯醛、哌替啶、羟嗪与咪达唑仑方案用于儿科牙科患者口服镇静的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2005 May-Jun;27(3):191-7.
7
Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.使用咪达唑仑进行小儿清醒镇静时与给药途径相关的因素。
ASDC J Dent Child. 2001 Jul-Aug;68(4):233-8, 228.
8
Effectiveness of premedication agents administered prior to nitrous oxide/oxygen.预给一氧化二氮/氧气前给药对其效果的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Apr;27(4):341-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283313cdd.
9
Children sedated for dental care: a pilot study of the 24-hour postsedation period.接受牙科治疗镇静的儿童:镇静后24小时的初步研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):260-4.
10
A comparison of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide sedation for dental extractions in children.儿童拔牙时口服咪达唑仑与氧化亚氮镇静效果的比较。
Anaesthesia. 2006 Dec;61(12):1138-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04835.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and physiologic effects of intranasal midazolam and nitrous oxide inhalation based sedation in children visiting Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, India.印度萨维莎牙科学院及医院就诊儿童中,鼻内咪达唑仑与一氧化二氮吸入镇静的安全性及生理效应。
Bioinformation. 2022 Jan 31;18(1):26-35. doi: 10.6026/97320630018026. eCollection 2022.
2
Sedative and Behavioral Effects of Intranasal Midazolam in Comparison with Other Administrative Routes in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment - A Systematic Review.与其他给药途径相比,鼻内咪达唑仑对接受牙科治疗儿童的镇静及行为影响——一项系统评价
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Apr-Jun;12(2):105-120. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_470_20. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
3
Comparative Analysis of Intravenous Midazolam with Nasal Spray for Conscious Sedation in Minor Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeries.
静脉注射咪达唑仑与鼻喷雾剂用于小型口腔颌面外科手术清醒镇静的比较分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Feb;11(Suppl 1):S42-S50. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_199_18.
4
Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.牙科治疗中儿童的镇静
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD003877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003877.pub5.
5
What is the level of evidence for the amnestic effects of sedatives in pediatric patients? A systematic review and meta-analyses.镇静剂对儿科患者遗忘作用的证据水平如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180248. eCollection 2017.
6
Conscious Sedation Efficacy of 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg Oral Midazolam for Three to Six Year-Old Uncooperative Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Clinical Trial.0.3和0.5毫克/千克口服咪达唑仑对3至6岁不合作接受牙科治疗儿童的清醒镇静效果:一项临床试验
J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Mar;13(2):101-107.
7
Memory effects of sedative drugs in children and adolescents--protocol for a systematic review.镇静药物对儿童和青少年的记忆影响——系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 18;5:34. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0192-x.
8
The Efficacy of Two Intravenous Sedative Drugs in Management of Uncooperative Children for Dental Treatments.两种静脉镇静药物在治疗不合作儿童牙科疾病中的疗效
J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1 Suppl):29-34.
9
Effect of oral-transmucosal midazolam sedation on anxiety levels of 3-4 years old children during a Class II restorative procedure.口腔黏膜咪达唑仑镇静对3 - 4岁儿童II类修复治疗过程中焦虑水平的影响。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Jul;5(3):334-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.137933.
10
Sedative Effect of Oral Midazolam/Hydroxyzine versus Chloral Hydrate/Hydroxyzine on 2-6 Year-Old Uncooperative Dental Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口服咪达唑仑/羟嗪与水合氯醛/羟嗪对2至6岁不合作牙科患者的镇静效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jan;11(1):93-9. Epub 2014 Jan 31.