Medical journals and the science of peer review: raising the standard.
作者信息
Callaham M L, Waeckerle J F
出版信息
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;28(1):75-7.
PMID:8669742
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Medical journals and the science of peer review: raising the standard.医学期刊与同行评审科学：提高标准
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;28(1):75-7.
2
On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.成为神经心理学杂志的同行评审员。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):201-7. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp031. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
3
Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.期刊要接受同行评审过程的审查。
Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. doi: 10.1038/439252b.
4
Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.有意义的同行评审是高质量科学不可或缺的一部分，应该对作者和评审人员都有益处。
Andrology. 2013 Jul;1(4):531-2. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00105.x.
5
Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.审阅同行评议期刊的稿件：新手和经验丰富的审稿人的入门指南。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x.
6
Publish or perish: easier said than done.
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2001 Dec;13(4):407-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1035-6851.2001.00258.x.
7
Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.面临压力的期刊：发表文章，后果自负。
Nature. 2002 Oct 24;419(6909):772-6. doi: 10.1038/419772a.
8
Peer review.同行评审。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Apr;96-B(4):436-41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041.
9
Consider the source.考虑一下来源。
Am J Nurs. 2009 Apr;109(4):7. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000348565.33769.54.
10
Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.期刊：如何判断哪些内容值得发表。
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209-10. doi: 10.1038/421209b.
引用本文的文献
1
The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: peer review education in biomedical informatics.《美国医学信息学会杂志》学生编辑委员会：生物医学信息学中的同行评审教育。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):87-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1473.
Zotero 插件