• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前额叶皮质受损后无法对预期的未来结果做出自主反应。

Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex.

作者信息

Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio A R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):215-25. doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/6.2.215
PMID:8670652
Abstract

Following damage to specific sectors of the prefrontal cortex, humans develop a defect in real-life decision making, in spite of otherwise normal intellectual performance. The patients so affected may even realize the consequences of their actions but fail to act accordingly, thus appearing oblivious to the future. The neural basis of this defect has resisted explanation. Here we identify a physiological correlate for the defect and discuss its possible significance. We measured the skin conductance responses (SCRs) of 7 patients with prefrontal damage, and 12 normal controls, during the performance of a novel task, a card game that simulates real-life decision making in the way it factors uncertainty, rewards, and penalties. Both patients and controls generated SCRs after selecting cards that were followed by penalties or by reward. However, after a number of trials, controls also began to generate SCRs prior to their selection of a card, while they pondered from which deck to choose, but no patients showed such anticipatory SCRs. The absence of anticipatory SCRs in patients with prefrontal damage is a correlate of their insensitivity to future outcomes. It is compatible with the idea that these patients fail to activate biasing signals that would serve as value markers in the distinction between choices with good or bad future outcomes; that these signals also participate in the enhancement of attention and working memory relative to representations pertinent to the decision process; and that the signals hail from the bioregulatory machinery that sustains somatic homeostasis and can be expressed in emotion and feeling.

摘要

前额叶皮质特定区域受损后,尽管智力表现正常,但人类在现实生活决策中会出现缺陷。受影响的患者甚至可能意识到自己行为的后果,却未能相应地采取行动,因此似乎对未来漠不关心。这种缺陷的神经基础一直难以解释。在此,我们确定了该缺陷的一种生理关联,并讨论了其可能的意义。我们在一项新任务(一种纸牌游戏,该游戏通过纳入不确定性、奖励和惩罚因素来模拟现实生活决策)的执行过程中,测量了7名前额叶受损患者和12名正常对照者的皮肤电导反应(SCR)。患者和对照者在选择了会带来惩罚或奖励的纸牌后都会产生SCR。然而,经过多次试验后,对照者在思考从哪叠纸牌中选择时,也开始在选择纸牌之前就产生SCR,但没有患者表现出这种预期性SCR。前额叶受损患者缺乏预期性SCR与他们对未来结果不敏感相关。这与以下观点相符:这些患者无法激活偏向信号,而这些信号在区分具有好坏未来结果的选择时可作为价值标记;这些信号还参与相对于与决策过程相关表征的注意力增强和工作记忆增强;并且这些信号来自维持躯体稳态的生物调节机制,并可在情绪和感觉中表现出来。

相似文献

1
Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex.前额叶皮质受损后无法对预期的未来结果做出自主反应。
Cereb Cortex. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):215-25. doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215.
2
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.人类前额叶皮层受损后对未来后果的不敏感。
Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):7-15. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3.
3
Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions.腹内侧前额叶皮质损伤患者决策缺陷的特征分析。
Brain. 2000 Nov;123 ( Pt 11):2189-202. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2189.
4
Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making.人类杏仁核和腹内侧前额叶皮质在决策中的不同作用。
J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5473-81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05473.1999.
5
Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.在知晓有利策略之前做出有利决策。
Science. 1997 Feb 28;275(5304):1293-5. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293.
6
The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation.躯体标记假说:批判性评估。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(2):239-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
7
Decision-making in amnesia: do advantageous decisions require conscious knowledge of previous behavioural choices?失忆症中的决策:有利的决策是否需要对先前行为选择有有意识的认知?
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
8
Psychophysiological anticipation of positive outcomes promotes advantageous decision-making in normal older persons.对积极结果的心理生理预期促进正常老年人做出有利决策。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Jul;61(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.021. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage.前额叶腹内侧损伤后道德判断的心理生理学研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1888-99. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21367.
10
Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli.因额叶损伤导致具有反社会行为的个体对社会刺激无法产生自主反应。
Behav Brain Res. 1990 Dec 14;41(2):81-94. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90144-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision making in frontotemporal dementia: neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessments.额颞叶痴呆中的决策制定:神经心理学和神经影像学评估
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jul 31;19:1632054. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1632054. eCollection 2025.
2
The orbitofrontal cortex underlies consolidation of Pavlovian anticipatory arousal responses in macaque monkeys.眶额叶皮质是猕猴巴甫洛夫式预期唤醒反应巩固的基础。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0619-25.2025.
3
Lesion to the vmPFC abolishes intentionality (mis)attribution in the Knobe effect.
腹内侧前额叶皮层受损会消除诺布效应中的意向性(错误)归因。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03457-y.
4
The Level and Nature of Impairment on the Iowa Gambling Task Following Acquired Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis.脑损伤后爱荷华赌博任务中的损伤水平与性质:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09668-4.
5
TMS-EEG evidence links random exploration to inhibitory mechanisms in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.经颅磁刺激-脑电图证据表明,随机探索与背外侧前额叶皮层的抑制机制有关。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 5;15(1):15654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00034-1.
6
A review on exploration-exploitation trade-off in psychiatric disorders.关于精神疾病中探索-利用权衡的综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06837-w.
7
Decision-making and performance in the Iowa Gambling Task: recent ERP findings and clinical implications.爱荷华赌博任务中的决策与表现:近期事件相关电位研究结果及临床意义
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1492471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492471. eCollection 2025.
8
Unlocking new insights into the somatic marker hypothesis with multilevel logistic models.运用多层逻辑模型揭示对体感标记假说的新见解。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01271-7.
9
A Prefrontal→Periaqueductal Gray Pathway Differentially Engages Autonomic, Hormonal, and Behavioral Features of the Stress-Coping Response.前额皮质→中脑导水管周围灰质通路对压力应对反应的自主神经、激素和行为特征有差异地参与。
J Neurosci. 2024 Nov 13;44(46):e0844242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0844-24.2024.
10
A century of exercise physiology: key concepts in neural control of the circulation.运动生理学百年:循环神经控制的关键概念
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 May;124(5):1323-1336. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05451-0. Epub 2024 Mar 5.