Bishop D V, Ross V A, Daniels M S, Bright P
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Br J Psychol. 1996 May;87 ( Pt 2):269-85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02590.x.
Three groups of right-handers were identified using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Exclusive strong right-handers (Rs: N = 18) reported that they always used the right hand for eight or more of the 10 activities, and usually used the right hand for the remainder. Exclusive weak right-handers (Rw: N = 15) usually used the right hand for three or more activities, and always used the right hand for the remainder. Predominant right-handers (Rp: N = 18) preferred the right hand for most items, but used the left hand for at least one activity. These groups did not differ on three measures of relative skill of the two hands: peg-moving, tapping and dotting. Groups Rs and Rw were also indistinguishable in terms of the hand used for reaching for cards placed in different spatial positions. However, the reaching measure did discriminate group Rp, which included some individuals who reached predominantly with the left hand. It is concluded that preference batteries should quantify degree of hand preference in terms of the number of activities for which a preference is shown, ignoring the distinction between 'usually' and 'always'. The behavioural reaching measure shows promise as a method for providing a unitary scale of hand preference.
使用爱丁堡利手问卷确定了三组右利手者。纯强右利手者(Rs组:N = 18)报告称,在10项活动中,他们总是用右手进行8项或更多活动,其余活动通常用右手。纯弱右利手者(Rw组:N = 15)通常用右手进行3项或更多活动,其余活动总是用右手。优势右利手者(Rp组:N = 18)在大多数项目上更喜欢用右手,但至少有一项活动用左手。这三组在双手相对技能的三项测量指标上没有差异:插栓移动、轻敲和点画。Rs组和Rw组在伸手去拿放置在不同空间位置的卡片时所使用的手方面也没有区别。然而,伸手测量指标确实区分出了Rp组,该组包括一些主要用左手伸手的个体。研究得出结论,偏好量表应该根据表现出偏好的活动数量来量化利手程度,而忽略“通常”和“总是”之间的区别。行为伸手测量指标有望成为一种提供统一利手量表的方法。