• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳声发射对听力正常受试者强度的刚可察觉差别的影响。

Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.

作者信息

Probst R, Harris F P

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jul;100(1):504-10. doi: 10.1121/1.415863.

DOI:10.1121/1.415863
PMID:8675843
Abstract

Measurements of spontaneous and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were used to classify listeners with normal hearing into one of two categories--those with spontaneous emissions (SOAEs) and high-level transiently evoked emissions (TEOAEs) in both ears (strong emissions) and those with no SOAEs and low-level TEOAEs in either ear (weak emissions). Just-noticeable differences (jnd's) in intensity for 1-kHz pure tones presented at either 60, 40, or 20 dB SL were determined for these two groups using a continuous pedestal technique. Mean jnd's for intensity for the two groups did not differ significantly. Intratest variability was compared and the group with strong emissions had significantly higher variability for presentation levels of 20 dB SL and lower variability at 60 dB SL. Additional testing of intensity jnd's was performed in individuals with strong emissions using pure tones 30 Hz lower than a targeted SOAE frequency. Large interindividual differences were present without a specific pattern. It is concluded that OAE activity level does not affect the mean jnd for intensity discrimination. Individuals with strong emissions have less variance when performing the test at higher levels and more variance for lower level stimuli than do individuals with weak emission characteristics. Because an ear's OAE characteristics can alter performance on psychoacoustic tasks, knowledge of such characteristics is desirable when psychoacoustic results are acquired and reported.

摘要

通过测量自发性耳声发射(SOAE)和瞬态诱发性耳声发射(TEOAEs),将听力正常的受试者分为两类:双耳均有自发性耳声发射(SOAE)和高水平瞬态诱发性耳声发射(TEOAEs)的受试者(强发射),以及双耳均无SOAE且TEOAEs水平较低的受试者(弱发射)。使用连续基座技术,针对这两组受试者,测定了在60、40或20 dB SL下呈现的1kHz纯音强度的最小可觉差(jnd)。两组受试者的强度平均jnd无显著差异。比较了测试内的变异性,结果显示,在20 dB SL的呈现水平下,强发射组的变异性显著更高,而在60 dB SL下,变异性更低。对强发射个体进行了额外测试,使用比目标SOAE频率低30 Hz的纯音测量强度jnd。个体间存在较大差异,且无特定模式。研究得出结论,耳声发射活动水平不影响强度辨别平均jnd。与弱发射特征个体相比,强发射个体在较高水平进行测试时变异性较小,而在较低水平刺激下变异性较大。由于耳朵的耳声发射特征可能会改变心理声学任务的表现,因此在获取和报告心理声学结果时,了解这些特征是很有必要的。

相似文献

1
Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.耳声发射对听力正常受试者强度的刚可察觉差别的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jul;100(1):504-10. doi: 10.1121/1.415863.
2
Intensity discrimination, temporal integration and gap detection by normally-hearing subjects with weak and strong otoacoustic emissions.听力正常且耳声发射较弱和较强的受试者的强度辨别、时间整合和间隙检测
Audiology. 1999 Sep-Oct;38(5):251-6. doi: 10.3109/00206099909073030.
3
Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.儿童中的啁啾诱发耳声发射
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;77(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
4
[Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].[内耳听力损失对瞬态耳声发射(TEOAE)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)的影响]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1996 Dec;75(12):709-18. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997664.
5
Evaluation of cochlear function in patients with tinnitus using spontaneous and transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions.使用自发性和瞬态诱发耳声发射评估耳鸣患者的耳蜗功能。
J Otolaryngol. 2007 Oct;36(5):296-302. doi: 10.2310/7070.2007.0046.
6
Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.学童的自发性耳声发射
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;89:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.07.034. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Effects of atmospheric pressure variation on spontaneous, transiently evoked, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal human ears.大气压力变化对正常人类耳朵中自发、瞬态诱发及畸变产物耳声发射的影响。
Hear Res. 1993 Sep;69(1-2):133-45. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90101-6.
8
Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.在听力损失超过 0.25、0.5 和 1 kHz 的受试者中,进行啁啾声和点击诱发耳声发射。
Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):757-67. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825c05ac.
9
Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears.正常耳和病理耳在等响度水平下的强度刚可察觉差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jan;93(1):425-34. doi: 10.1121/1.405622.
10
Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in humans with endolymphatic hydrops.内淋巴积水患者的自发性耳声发射
Laryngoscope. 2001 Jan;111(1):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200101000-00017.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.耳声发射与常见心理声学任务表现之间的相关性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Apr;143(4):2355. doi: 10.1121/1.5030999.
2
Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.比较组合音的行为和生理测量:性别和种族差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):968-83. doi: 10.1121/1.4731224.