Suppr超能文献

近端胃迷走神经切断术。犬模型中开放手术与腹腔镜手术方法的比较。

Proximal gastric vagotomy. Comparison between open and laparoscopic methods in the canine model.

作者信息

Kollmorgen C F, Gunes S, Donohue J H, Thompson G B, Sarr M G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1996 Jul;224(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199607000-00007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared open and laparoscopic proximal gastric vagotomies for efficacy of acid reduction and preservation of gastric emptying.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic methods have been used to perform vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcer; however, no direct comparisons are available of laparoscopic and open surgical procedures regarding acid reduction and gastric emptying.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive dogs were randomized to open proximal gastric vagotomy (OPGV; n = 11), laparoscopic anterior seromyotomy and posterior truncal vagotomy (ASPTV; n = 10), or laparoscopic proximal gastric vagotomy (LPGV; n = 10). Intraoperative endoscopic Congo red testing assured complete vagotomy. Basal acid output (BAO) and maximal acid output (MAO) during pentagastrin and insulin-induced hypoglycemia were measured with marker dilution techniques, and gastric emptying was assessed with radionuclide-labelled solid and liquid markers before and 5 weeks after operation.

RESULTS

Operative time (mean +/- standard error of the mean) for OPGV was shorter compared with ASPTV and LPGV (86 +/- 7 minutes vs. 124 +/- 7 minutes and 115 +/- 7 minutes; p < 0.002). Postoperative BAO did not decrease in any group. Open proximal gastric vagotomy and LPGV, but not ASPTV, decreased MAO (p < 0.05); (after pentagastrin, OPGV from 26.4 +/- 1.7 mEq/hour to 11.3 +/- 0.1 mEq/hour, LPGV from 21.4 +/- 1.0 mEq/hour to 6.4 +/- 0.5 mEq/hour; after insulin-induced hypoglycemia, OPGV from 9.9 +/- 0.5 mEq/hour to 2.2 +/- 0.3 mEq/hour, LPGV from 7.9 +/- 0.5 mEq/hour to 1.9 +/- 0.4 mEq/hour). Gastric emptying of liquids and solids, as quantitated by the time for one half of the marker to empty (T 1/2) and the shape of the emptying curve, were similar before and after all three surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic proximal gastric vagotomy was comparable to OPGV in decreasing stimulated gastric acid production without significantly altering gastric emptying. Anterior seromyotomy and posterior truncal vagotomy was less effective in decreasing MAO and required more operative time. Laparoscopic proximal gastric vagotomy has the potential to become accepted therapy for patients with duodenal ulcer managed presently with OPGV.

摘要

目的

作者比较了开腹和腹腔镜近端胃迷走神经切断术在减少胃酸分泌及保留胃排空功能方面的疗效。

总结背景资料

腹腔镜手术方法已用于十二指肠溃疡患者的迷走神经切断术;然而,关于腹腔镜手术与开腹手术在减少胃酸分泌及胃排空方面尚无直接比较。

方法

将31只连续入选的犬随机分为开腹近端胃迷走神经切断术组(OPGV;n = 11)、腹腔镜前壁浆膜切开及后壁迷走神经干切断术组(ASPTV;n = 10)或腹腔镜近端胃迷走神经切断术组(LPGV;n = 10)。术中内镜刚果红试验确保迷走神经切断完全。采用标记稀释技术测量五肽胃泌素和胰岛素诱发低血糖期间的基础胃酸分泌量(BAO)和最大胃酸分泌量(MAO),并在术前及术后5周用放射性核素标记的固体和液体标志物评估胃排空情况。

结果

与ASPTV组和LPGV组相比,OPGV组的手术时间(平均值±平均标准误)较短(分别为86±7分钟、124±7分钟和115±7分钟;p < 0.002)。术后所有组的BAO均未降低。开腹近端胃迷走神经切断术组和LPGV组可降低MAO,但ASPTV组未降低(p < 0.05);(五肽胃泌素刺激后,OPGV组从26.4±1.7 mEq/小时降至11.3±0.1 mEq/小时,LPGV组从21.4±1.0 mEq/小时降至6.4±0.5 mEq/小时;胰岛素诱发低血糖后,OPGV组从9.9±0.5 mEq/小时降至2.2±0.3 mEq/小时,LPGV组从7.9±0.5 mEq/小时降至1.9±0.4 mEq/小时)。通过标志物排空一半所需时间(T 1/2)及排空曲线形状定量的液体和固体胃排空情况,在所有三种手术前后均相似。

结论

腹腔镜近端胃迷走神经切断术在减少刺激胃酸分泌方面与OPGV相当,且不显著改变胃排空。前壁浆膜切开及后壁迷走神经干切断术在降低MAO方面效果较差,且手术时间更长。腹腔镜近端胃迷走神经切断术有可能成为目前采用OPGV治疗的十二指肠溃疡患者的可接受治疗方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Laparoscopic proximal gastric vagotomy.
Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994 Apr;2(2):105-8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验