Mazeron J J, Belkacemi Y, Simon J M, Le Péchoux C, Martin M, Haddad E, Piedbois P, Calitchi E, Strunski W, Peynègre R, Le Bourgeois J P, Pierquin B
Département interhospitalier de cancérologie, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France.
Bull Cancer Radiother. 1996;83(1):47-53.
We have reviewed the results of 165 T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the faucial arch treated by definitive irradiation including or not iridium 192 brachytherapy to ascertain whether a significant relationship exists between iridium implantation, local control, complications and survival. From March 1971 to November 1990, 58 T1 and 107 T2 (NO: 107/165; N1: 30/165; N2: 9/165; N3: 19/165) biopsy proven squamous cell carcinomas of the tonsillar region (104/165) and the soft palate and uvula (61/165) were treated in the Henri Mondor Hospital by definitive irradiation with curative intent. From 1971 to 1981 (period 1), only guide gutter technique was available, so that implants were reserved for small tumors: patients were either managed by definitive telecobaltherapy to tumor site and neck node areas (group I; n = 48; mean dose: 70 Gy; confidence interval: +/- 5.5, 5 fractions of 1.8 Gy per week) or by exclusive iridium implant (group 2; n = 11; all T1NO; 64 Gy +/- 4.8) or by a combination of external beam radiation therapy to tumor site and neck nodes areas and iridium implant (group 3; n = 40). In 1981 (period 2), a new plastic tube technique, which enables implantation of larger areas, was introduced and all patients (group 4; n = 66) were then managed by external radiation therapy (group 3 + 4: 47 Gy +/- 4.3) followed by an iridium implant (31 Gy +/- 10.5). Clinically positive neck nodes either received additional external dose with electrons or were excised. Overall 5-year survival (Kaplan Meier) was 23%, 50.5%, and 60% in groups 1, 2 and 3 + 4, respectively (p < 0.001, log rank). Five-year local control was 58%, 100%, and 91%, respectively (p < 0.001). Five-year necrosis rate was 10%, 25% and 30%, respectively (NS). Comparison of results between the two periods of the study (group 1 + 2 + 3 vs group 4) shows that these two groups are statistically comparable according to site and size of tumor and N status and that both local control (77% vs 94% at 5 years; p < 0.01) and disease free survival (56% vs 71%; p = 0.03) were improved after 1980, while there was a trend to an increase in overall survival (42% vs 53% at 5 years; p = 0.08); nodal control (86% vs 95% at 5 years) and necrosis rate (11% vs 20% at 5 years) were not modified. Multivariate analysis showed that both local control (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p < 0.0001) were improved when tumor was implanted. We recommend then to treat T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the faucial arch by external radiation therapy to tumor site and neck areas (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) followed by a 30 Gy iridium implant and, for patients with clinically positive nodes, either a further 25-30 Gy electron beam irradiation to the nodes or neck node dissection.
我们回顾了165例经根治性放疗治疗的咽弓T1和T2期鳞状细胞癌的结果,放疗包括或不包括铱192近距离放疗,以确定铱植入、局部控制、并发症和生存率之间是否存在显著关系。1971年3月至1990年11月,亨利·蒙多医院对58例T1期和107例T2期(NO:107/165;N1:30/165;N2:9/165;N3:19/165)经活检证实的扁桃体区(104/165)以及软腭和悬雍垂(61/165)的鳞状细胞癌进行了根治性放疗。1971年至1981年(第1阶段),仅可采用引导槽技术,因此植入仅用于小肿瘤:患者要么接受针对肿瘤部位和颈部淋巴结区域的根治性远距离钴治疗(第1组;n = 48;平均剂量:70 Gy;置信区间:±5.5,每周5次,每次1.8 Gy),要么接受单纯铱植入(第2组;n = 11;均为T1NO;64 Gy±4.8),要么接受针对肿瘤部位和颈部淋巴结区域的外照射放疗与铱植入联合治疗(第3组;n = 40)。1981年(第2阶段),引入了一种新的塑料管技术,该技术能够植入更大区域,然后所有患者(第4组;n = 66)均接受外照射放疗(第3组和第4组合计:47 Gy±4.3),随后进行铱植入(31 Gy±10.5)。临床阳性颈部淋巴结要么接受额外的电子外照射剂量,要么进行切除。第1组、第2组和第3 + 4组的总体5年生存率(卡普兰 - 迈耶法)分别为23%、50.5%和60%(p < 0.001,对数秩检验)。5年局部控制率分别为58%、100%和91%(p < 0.001)。5年坏死率分别为10%、25%和30%(无统计学差异)。研究两个阶段结果的比较(第1 + 2 + 3组与第4组)表明,根据肿瘤部位、大小和N分期,这两组在统计学上具有可比性,并且1980年后局部控制率(5年时77%对94%;p < 0.01)和无病生存率(56%对71%;p = 0.03)均有所提高,而总体生存率有上升趋势(5年时42%对53%;p = 0.08);淋巴结控制率(5年时86%对95%)和坏死率(5年时11%对20%)未改变。多变量分析表明,植入肿瘤后局部控制率(p < 0.0001)和总体生存率(p < 0.0001)均有所提高。我们建议对咽弓T1和T2期鳞状细胞癌患者,先对肿瘤部位和颈部区域进行外照射放疗(45 Gy/25次/5周),随后进行30 Gy铱植入,对于临床阳性淋巴结患者,要么对淋巴结进一步进行25 - 30 Gy电子束照射,要么进行颈部淋巴结清扫。