• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功选择临床信息系统的策略。

Strategies for successful clinical information system selection.

作者信息

Staggers N, Repko K B

出版信息

Comput Nurs. 1996 May-Jun;14(3):146-7, 155.

PMID:8681206
Abstract

The CIS market is volatile. With consumer pressure to develop and the current interest in CISs, clinicians recommended reassessing the market again in 18 months. Even without fully mature systems, there are foundational CISs available on the market. Strategies for successful CIS selections are many: Decide to be a developer or buyer early in the process. Entering into a long-term relationship with a vendor to develop customized capabilities will mandate different requirements than purchasing a ready-to-use system. Use a systematic method for evaluating systems, preferably multimethod. Force structure into the evaluation process with vendors, especially for the system demonstration. Structure will ensure that each system function, or lack of function, is exposed and assessed and will allow for consistent and fair evaluations across vendors. Make the vendor commit to distinguishing between existing and proposed functions during system demonstrations. Often, vendors promise the very functions you want to be in the next release. Most vendors will cooperate with structured schedules. However, some vendors may resist structure because it interferes with marketing strategies. If, despite requests for specific materials and schedules, vendors fill the time with unsolicited material, ask yourself why and beware: they may not have the functions you requested. Use a brief clinical scenario as a preview into system functions, integration, and system usability. Ask vendors for conceptual models of system functional and technical architecture. Use an interdisciplinary team. Focus subgroups in specialty areas for efficiency and effectiveness in evaluation. Consider tape-recording the joint group sessions for later confirmation or analysis. Consider application integration as one of the major requirements for future CISs, especially between ambulatory and inpatient arenas.

摘要

独联体市场动荡不安。鉴于消费者对其发展的压力以及当前对临床信息系统(CIS)的兴趣,临床医生建议在18个月后再次重新评估该市场。即使没有完全成熟的系统,市场上也有基础的CIS可供选择。成功选择CIS的策略有很多:在过程早期决定是成为开发者还是购买者。与供应商建立长期合作关系以开发定制功能将需要不同于购买即用型系统的要求。使用系统的方法评估系统,最好是多方法评估。在与供应商的评估过程中引入结构,尤其是在系统演示时。结构将确保每个系统功能或功能缺失都能被揭示和评估,并允许对各供应商进行一致且公平的评估。在系统演示期间,要求供应商承诺区分现有功能和提议功能。通常,供应商会承诺你希望在下一版本中出现的功能。大多数供应商会配合结构化的时间表。然而,一些供应商可能会抵制结构化,因为它会干扰营销策略。如果尽管要求提供特定材料和时间表,但供应商用主动提供的材料填满时间,问问自己原因并保持警惕:他们可能没有你要求的功能。使用简短的临床场景来预览系统功能、集成和系统可用性。向供应商索要系统功能和技术架构的概念模型。使用跨学科团队。在专业领域设立重点小组以提高评估的效率和效果。考虑录制联合小组会议以便后续确认或分析。将应用程序集成视为未来CIS的主要要求之一,尤其是在门诊和住院领域之间。

相似文献

1
Strategies for successful clinical information system selection.成功选择临床信息系统的策略。
Comput Nurs. 1996 May-Jun;14(3):146-7, 155.
2
Materials management information systems.材料管理信息系统
Health Devices. 1996 Feb-Mar;25(2-3):48-100.
3
Demystifying radiology information systems.解读放射学信息系统
Radiol Manage. 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):52-6.
4
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
5
Patient accounting systems: needs and capabilities.患者计费系统:需求与功能
Healthc Financ Manage. 1987 Sep;41(9):82-90.
6
The request for proposal and vendor selection process.提案请求和供应商选择流程。
Top Health Inf Manage. 1992 Aug;13(1):11-9.
7
Vendor support for computer systems.
Health Prog. 1988 Oct;69(8):45-7.
8
Group purchasing: vendor selection.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1987 Sep;44(9):2035-40.
9
Learn from experience: insights of 200+ PACS customers.从经验中学习:200 多位 PACS 客户的见解。
Radiol Manage. 2002 Jan-Feb;24(1):22-7.
10
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.