Boldt J, Müller M, Heyn S, Welters I, Hempelmann G
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jun;24(6):940-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00011.
To determine the influence of pentoxifylline on endothelial-associated coagulation.
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
A surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Consecutive patients (n = 60) with trauma or sepsis secondary to major (nontrauma) surgery. All patients received controlled mechanical ventilation.
According to a randomized sequence, the patients either received pentoxifylline continuously over 5 days (1.5 mg/kg/hr iv) (trauma-pentoxifylline group [n = 15], sepsis-pentoxifylline group [n=15] or saline solution as placebo (trauma-control group [n = 15], sepsis-control group [n = 15].
In addition to the standard coagulation screen, thrombomodulin, protein C, (free) protein S, and thrombin-antithrombin plasma concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Intensive care therapy, hemodynamics, and changes of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score were comparable for pentoxifylline-treated and nontreated patients. An average dose of 2.5 g/day of pentoxifylline (range 2.2 to 2.9) was infused into the pentoxifylline-treated patients. At baseline, plasma thrombomodulin concentrations were higher in the septic patients than in the trauma patients. Thrombomodulin plasma concentrations increased significantly more in the control patients (trauma: from 38.9 +/- 10.5 to 59.9 +/- 10.1 ng/mL; sepsis: from 49.7 +/- 12.1 to 72.3 +/- 11.2 ng/mL) than in the pentoxifylline-treated patients (trauma: from 37.9 +/- 11.9 to 50.2 +/- 9.2 ng/mL; sepsis from 51.9 +/- 10.1 to 63.3 +/- 10.2). Starting from similar baseline values, protein C concentration increased significantly more in the sepsis-pentoxifylline patients (from 52.0 +/- 11.1% to 69.1 +/- 11.1%) than in the untreated septic patients (from 50.1 +/- 10.0% to 52.5 +/- 9.5%). There were no significant differences between the pentoxifylline-treated and nontreated groups for protein S and thrombin-antithrombin concentrations. Standard coagulation parameters (fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, antithrombin III) did not differ between these groups either.
Continuous intravenous administration of pentoxifylline for 5 days beneficially influenced the thrombomodulin/protein C/protein S system in both the trauma and septic patients.
确定己酮可可碱对内皮相关凝血的影响。
前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
一所大学医院的外科重症监护病房。
因重大(非创伤性)手术继发创伤或脓毒症的连续患者(n = 60)。所有患者均接受控制性机械通气。
按照随机序列,患者要么连续5天接受己酮可可碱治疗(1.5毫克/千克/小时静脉注射)(创伤-己酮可可碱组[n = 15],脓毒症-己酮可可碱组[n = 15]),要么接受生理盐水作为安慰剂(创伤-对照组[n = 15],脓毒症-对照组[n = 15])。
除了标准凝血筛查外,通过酶联免疫吸附测定法测量血栓调节蛋白、蛋白C、(游离)蛋白S和凝血酶-抗凝血酶血浆浓度。己酮可可碱治疗组和未治疗组患者的重症监护治疗、血流动力学以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II的变化相当。己酮可可碱治疗组患者平均每天输注2.5克己酮可可碱(范围为2.2至2.9克)。基线时,脓毒症患者的血浆血栓调节蛋白浓度高于创伤患者。对照组患者(创伤:从38.9±10.5至59.9±10.1纳克/毫升;脓毒症:从49.7±12.1至72.3±11.2纳克/毫升)血浆血栓调节蛋白浓度的升高幅度显著大于己酮可可碱治疗组患者(创伤:从37.9±11.9至50.2±9.2纳克/毫升;脓毒症:从51.9±10.1至63.3±10.2纳克/毫升)。从相似的基线值开始,脓毒症-己酮可可碱组患者的蛋白C浓度升高幅度(从52.0±11.1%至69.1±11.1%)显著大于未治疗的脓毒症患者(从50.1±10.0%至52.5±9.5%)。己酮可可碱治疗组和未治疗组在蛋白S和凝血酶-抗凝血酶浓度方面无显著差异。这些组之间的标准凝血参数(纤维蛋白原、活化部分凝血活酶时间、抗凝血酶III)也无差异。
连续静脉输注己酮可可碱5天对创伤和脓毒症患者的血栓调节蛋白/蛋白C/蛋白S系统产生有益影响。