• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

容量治疗的类型是否会影响危重症患者的内皮相关凝血功能?

Does the type of volume therapy influence endothelial-related coagulation in the critically ill?

作者信息

Boldt J, Heesen M, Welters I, Padberg W, Martin K, Hempelmann G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;75(6):740-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.6.740.

DOI:10.1093/bja/75.6.740
PMID:8672323
Abstract

The endothelium plays an important role in the regulation of haemostasis by producing substances such as thrombomodulin (TM). The influence of long-term volume replacement with different types of fluid on the TM-protein C-protein S system was investigated in a prospective, randomized study. Thirty trauma patients and 30 patients suffering from sepsis after major surgery received either 10% low-molecular weight (LMW) hydroxyethylstarch solution (HES-trauma, n = 15; HES-sepsis, n = 15) or 20% human albumin (HA-trauma, n = 15; HA-sepsis, n = 15) for 5 days to maintain central venous pressure (CVP) between 12 and 16 mm Hg. Plasma concentrations of TM, protein C, (free) protein S and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) were measured in arterial blood samples obtained on the day of admission to the intensive care unit or on the day of diagnosis of sepsis and over the next 5 days. There were no differences between HA- and HES-treated trauma patients. Protein C and protein S also did not differ between HA- and HES-treatments. At baseline, TM plasma concentrations were increased to > 40 micrograms litre-1 in both sepsis groups only. In the HA-sepsis group, TM increased significantly (from 48.1 (SD 13.9) to 68.4 (13.0) micrograms litre-1), whereas it remained almost unchanged in the HES-sepsis group. In HES-sepsis patients, protein C (from 51.0 (10.1) to 71.9 (8.9)%) and protein S (from 19.0 (6.0) to 40.8 (11.4)%) increased significantly during the study, whereas both remained reduced in HA-patients. TAT (indicating intravascular coagulation) did not differ between the two fluid groups. We conclude that in trauma patients, the type of volume therapy had no influence on the TM-protein C-protein S system. In sepsis patients, volume therapy with HES was beneficial, whereas infusion of HA had no substantial positive effect on endothelial-associated coagulation.

摘要

内皮细胞通过产生血栓调节蛋白(TM)等物质,在止血调节中发挥重要作用。在一项前瞻性随机研究中,研究了用不同类型液体进行长期容量替代对TM-蛋白C-蛋白S系统的影响。30例创伤患者和30例大手术后发生脓毒症的患者接受了为期5天的10%低分子(LMW)羟乙基淀粉溶液(创伤组用HES,n = 15;脓毒症组用HES,n = 15)或20%人白蛋白(创伤组用HA,n = 15;脓毒症组用HA,n = 15)治疗,以维持中心静脉压(CVP)在12至16 mmHg之间。在重症监护病房入院当天或脓毒症诊断当天及随后5天采集的动脉血样本中,测量TM、蛋白C、(游离)蛋白S和凝血酶-抗凝血酶(TAT)的血浆浓度。接受HA和HES治疗的创伤患者之间没有差异。HA和HES治疗之间的蛋白C和蛋白S也没有差异。在基线时,仅在两个脓毒症组中,TM血浆浓度升高至>40微克/升。在HA-脓毒症组中,TM显著升高(从48.1(标准差13.9)升至68.4(13.0)微克/升),而在HES-脓毒症组中几乎保持不变。在HES-脓毒症患者中,研究期间蛋白C(从51.0(10.1)%升至71.9(8.9)%)和蛋白S(从19.0(6.0)%升至40.8(11.4)%)显著增加,而在HA患者中两者均保持降低。TAT(表明血管内凝血)在两组液体治疗之间没有差异。我们得出结论,在创伤患者中,容量治疗类型对TM-蛋白C-蛋白S系统没有影响。在脓毒症患者中,用HES进行容量治疗是有益的,而输注HA对内皮相关凝血没有实质性的积极作用。

相似文献

1
Does the type of volume therapy influence endothelial-related coagulation in the critically ill?容量治疗的类型是否会影响危重症患者的内皮相关凝血功能?
Br J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;75(6):740-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.6.740.
2
Influence of different volume therapies on platelet function in the critically ill.不同容量治疗对危重症患者血小板功能的影响
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Oct;22(10):1075-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01699231.
3
Volume therapy in the critically ill: is there a difference?危重症患者的容量治疗:有差异吗?
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Jan;24(1):28-36. doi: 10.1007/s001340050511.
4
The effects of albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch solution on cardiorespiratory and circulatory variables in critically ill patients.白蛋白与羟乙基淀粉溶液对危重症患者心肺及循环变量的影响。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):254-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00010.
5
Influence of different volume therapy regimens on regulators of the circulation in the critically ill.不同容量治疗方案对危重症患者循环调节因子的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):480-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.480.
6
Fluid replacement with hydroxyethyl starch in critical care--a reassessment.危重病患者羟乙基淀粉的液体替代治疗——再评估。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Jun;110(26):443-50. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0443. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
7
Influence of long-term continuous intravenous administration of pentoxifylline on endothelial-related coagulation in critically ill patients.长期持续静脉输注己酮可可碱对危重症患者内皮相关凝血的影响
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jun;24(6):940-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00011.
8
Thrombomodulin in intensive care patients.重症监护患者中的血栓调节蛋白
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Aug;21(8):645-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01711542.
9
Influence of different volume replacement strategies on inflammation and endothelial activation in the elderly undergoing major abdominal surgery.不同容量补充策略对老年腹部大手术患者炎症反应及内皮细胞激活的影响
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):416-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2110-7. Epub 2004 Jan 8.
10
Hydroxyethyl starch for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.羟乙基淀粉在危重症患者液体复苏中的应用。
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):709-13. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9936-4. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
2
Randomised trials of human albumin for adults with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of all-cause mortality.成人脓毒症患者使用人血白蛋白的随机试验:全因死亡率的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
BMJ. 2014 Jul 22;349:g4561. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4561.
3
Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
羟乙基淀粉 130/0.38-0.45 与晶体或白蛋白在脓毒症患者中的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ. 2013 Feb 15;346:f839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f839.
4
Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation.用于液体复苏的胶体溶液。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD001319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001319.pub5.
5
Renal outcomes and mortality following hydroxyethyl starch resuscitation of critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials: ATTENTION: The analysis and conclusions of this article are being revised by the authors. This is due to the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia's retraction of a paper by Dr. Joachim Boldt, an author in seven of the studies analyzed in this review. As such, the editors of Open Medicine recommend interpreting this review with extreme caution until Zarychanski et al. publish a new analysis and interpretation in Open Medicine. For more information, see Anesthesia and Analgesia's press release.重症患者羟乙基淀粉复苏后的肾脏结局和死亡率:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析:注意:本文的分析和结论正在由作者进行修订。这是因为《麻醉与镇痛》杂志撤回了约阿希姆·博尔特博士的一篇论文,他是本综述分析的七项研究的作者之一。因此,《开放医学》的编辑建议在扎里钱斯基等人在《开放医学》上发表新的分析和解读之前,极其谨慎地解读本综述。欲了解更多信息,请参阅《麻醉与镇痛》的新闻稿。
Open Med. 2009;3(4):e196-209. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
6
Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine.儿童及新生儿感染性休克血流动力学支持的临床实践参数:美国危重病医学会2007年更新版
Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-88. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819323c6.
7
Small-volume resuscitation with hyperoncotic albumin: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.高渗白蛋白小容量复苏:随机临床试验的系统评价
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R34. doi: 10.1186/cc6812. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis.关于羟乙基淀粉用于脓毒症液体管理的随机临床试验的系统评价
BMC Emerg Med. 2008 Jan 24;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-8-1.
9
Pro/con clinical debate: Hydroxyethylstarches should be avoided in septic patients.临床利弊辩论:脓毒症患者应避免使用羟乙基淀粉。
Crit Care. 2003 Aug;7(4):279-81. doi: 10.1186/cc1885. Epub 2003 Feb 19.
10
Salt of the earth or a drop in the ocean? A pathophysiological approach to fluid resuscitation.沧海一粟还是社会中坚?液体复苏的病理生理学方法。
Emerg Med J. 2003 Jul;20(4):306-15. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.4.306.