Suppr超能文献

欧洲总缺血负荷试验(TIBET)。阿替洛尔、缓释硝苯地平及其联合用药对608例稳定型心绞痛患者运动试验及总缺血负荷的影响。TIBET研究组

The Total Ischaemic Burden European Trial (TIBET). Effects of atenolol, nifedipine SR and their combination on the exercise test and the total ischaemic burden in 608 patients with stable angina. The TIBET Study Group.

作者信息

Fox K M, Mulcahy D, Findlay I, Ford I, Dargie H J

机构信息

Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1996 Jan;17(1):96-103. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014699.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of atenolol, nifedipine and their combination on exercise parameters and ambulatory ischaemic activity in patients with mild chronic stable angina.

SETTING

Multicentre, multinational study involving 608 patients from 69 centres in nine countries.

DESIGN

Placebo washout followed by double-blind parallel-group study comparing atenolol 50 mg bd, nifedipine SR 20 mg bd, and their combination. Patients underwent maximal exercise testing using either a bicycle (n = 289) or treadmill (n = 319) and 48 h of ambulatory ST segment monitoring outside the hospital environment at the end of the placebo washout period and after 6 weeks of active therapy.

RESULTS

Both medications alone and in combination caused significant improvements in exercise parameters and significant reductions in ischaemic activity during daily activities, when compared with placebo. There were, however, no significant differences between groups, for any of the measured ischaemic parameters although combination therapy resulted in a greater fall in resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure than either treatment alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In the management of mild chronic stable angina there appears to be little advantage gained from using combination therapy for ischaemia reduction.

摘要

目的

确定阿替洛尔、硝苯地平及其联合用药对轻度慢性稳定型心绞痛患者运动参数和动态缺血活动的影响。

设置

一项多中心、跨国研究,涉及来自9个国家69个中心的608例患者。

设计

安慰剂洗脱期后进行双盲平行组研究,比较阿替洛尔50mg每日两次、硝苯地平缓释片20mg每日两次及其联合用药。在安慰剂洗脱期结束时和积极治疗6周后,患者使用自行车(n = 289)或跑步机(n = 319)进行最大运动测试,并在院外环境进行48小时动态ST段监测。

结果

与安慰剂相比,两种药物单独使用及联合使用均能显著改善运动参数,并显著降低日常活动中的缺血活动。然而,尽管联合治疗导致静息收缩压和舒张压下降幅度大于单独使用任何一种治疗,但在任何测量的缺血参数方面,各治疗组之间均无显著差异。

结论

在轻度慢性稳定型心绞痛的治疗中,联合治疗在减少缺血方面似乎没有什么优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验