• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为食物选择性治疗方法的即时强化与延迟强化比较。

A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcement as treatments for food selectivity.

作者信息

Kern L, Marder T J

机构信息

Children's Seashore House, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):243-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-243.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-243
PMID:8682740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1279899/
Abstract

This study compared the relative efficacy of providing simultaneous or delayed reinforcement on food acceptance during meals. The participant was a 7 year-old boy with pervasive developmental disorder and a history of food selectivity. Results indicated that both procedures were effective in increasing acceptance; however, the simultaneous reinforcement procedure produced more rapid behavior change and a higher overall percentage of food acceptance.

摘要

本研究比较了在进餐期间同时给予强化或延迟给予强化对食物接受度的相对效果。参与者是一名7岁男孩,患有广泛性发育障碍且有食物选择性的病史。结果表明,两种程序在提高接受度方面均有效;然而,同时强化程序产生了更快的行为改变和更高的总体食物接受百分比。

相似文献

1
A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcement as treatments for food selectivity.作为食物选择性治疗方法的即时强化与延迟强化比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):243-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-243.
2
The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint.相依性和非相依性注意力对自我伤害及自我克制的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):107-10. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-107.
3
Use of extinction and reinforcement to increase food consumption and reduce expulsion.运用消退和强化来增加食物摄入量并减少排泄。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):581-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-581.
4
Experimental analysis and treatment of multiply controlled self-injury.多重控制的自我伤害行为的实验分析与治疗
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):183-96. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-183.
5
The use of an escape contingency and a token economy to increase food acceptance.使用逃避性应急措施和代币经济来提高食物接受度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;36(3):349-53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-349.
6
Oral feeding treatment of children with chronic food refusal and multiple developmental disabilities.对患有慢性食物拒食和多种发育障碍的儿童进行经口喂养治疗。
Am J Ment Retard. 1994 Mar;98(5):646-55.
7
A review of behavioral treatments for self-injurious behaviors of persons with autism spectrum disorders.孤独症谱系障碍患者自伤行为的行为治疗综述。
Behav Modif. 2008 Jan;32(1):61-76. doi: 10.1177/0145445507304581.
8
An alternating treatments comparison of two intensive interventions for food refusal.两种针对食物拒绝的强化干预措施的交替治疗比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):321-32. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-321.
9
Using simultaneous presentation to increase vegetable consumption in a mildly selective child with autism.采用同步呈现法增加一名轻度挑食自闭症儿童的蔬菜摄入量。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;36(3):361-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-361.
10
Using brief assessments to evaluate aberrant behavior maintained by attention.使用简短评估来评估由注意力维持的异常行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):109-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-109.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Simultaneous and Sequential Food Presentation to Increase Consumption of Novel Target Foods.比较同时呈现和顺序呈现食物以增加新型目标食物的摄入量
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Apr 17;16(4):1124-1137. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00789-x. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Simultaneous Presentation to Decrease Packing in a Child With a Feeding Disorder.同时呈现以减少患有喂养障碍儿童的进食量
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 May 29;13(1):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00360-7. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity.一种无逃避消退的治疗方案以解决食物选择性问题。
J Vis Exp. 2015 Aug 21(102):e52898. doi: 10.3791/52898.
4
An evaluation of a progressive high-probability instructional sequence combined with low-probability demand fading in the treatment of food selectivity.渐进式高概率教学序列联合低概率需求渐弱在食物选择性治疗中的效果评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Fall;45(3):527-37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-527.
5
Functional assessment and behavioural intervention for eating difficulties in children with autism: a study conducted in the natural environment using parents and ABA tutors as therapists.自闭症儿童进食困难的功能评估和行为干预:在自然环境中使用家长和 ABA 治疗师进行的研究。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Oct;41(10):1383-96. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1167-8.
6
Pediatric feeding disorders: a quantitative synthesis of treatment outcomes.儿科喂养障碍:治疗结果的定量综合。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;13(4):348-65. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0079-7.
7
The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.强化物配对与消退对学龄前儿童零食选择的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):633-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.633-644.
8
Evaluating preschool children's preferences for motivational systems during instruction.评估学龄前儿童在教学过程中对激励系统的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Summer;40(2):249-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.59-05.
9
Development and validation of an inventory to assess mealtime behavior problems in children with autism.用于评估自闭症儿童进餐行为问题的量表的编制与验证
J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Feb;38(2):342-52. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0401-5. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
10
An evaluation of simultaneous presentation and differential reinforcement with response cost to reduce packing.对同时呈现和采用反应代价的差别强化以减少囤积行为的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Fall;38(3):405-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.71-04.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of component analyses to identify active variables in treatment packages for children with feeding disorders.使用成分分析来识别喂养障碍儿童治疗方案中的有效变量。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):139-53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-139.
2
The costs of eating: a behavioral economic analysis of food refusal.饮食的代价:食物拒绝行为的经济学分析
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):245-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-245.
3
Behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic food refusal in handicapped children.残疾儿童慢性食物拒食的行为评估与治疗
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):327-41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-327.