• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通拼写者和拼写能力较差者的语音规则及视觉策略发展情况

The development of phonological rules and visual strategies in average and poor spellers.

作者信息

Lennox C, Siegel L S

机构信息

Peel Board of Education, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Jun;62(1):60-83. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0022.

DOI:10.1006/jecp.1996.0022
PMID:8683185
Abstract

To investigate the development of phonological and visual skills used in spelling, 420 children between the ages of 6 and 16 completed the spelling dictation test of the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. The misspellings were scored for phonological as well as visual accuracy using a constrained (inclusion of position cues) and an unconstrained system. Poor spellers made fewer phonologically accurate and fewer visual matches than age-matched average spellers. Poor spellers produced significantly more misspellings that were close visual matches to the target word and fewer phonologically unconstrained misspellings than spelling grade-matched average spellers. The groups did not differ in their production of phonologically constrained misspellings. Average spellers used a phonological approach more frequently than a visual approach, while the reverse pattern was true for poor spellers. When phonological rules are less well developed, then individuals are more likely to use orthographic skills.

摘要

为了研究拼写中语音和视觉技能的发展情况,420名6至16岁的儿童完成了《广泛成就测验修订版》的拼写听写测试。使用一种受限(包含位置线索)和一种非受限系统,对拼写错误在语音准确性和视觉准确性方面进行评分。与年龄匹配的平均拼写水平者相比,拼写能力差的人在语音准确性和视觉匹配方面的表现较差。与拼写成绩匹配的平均拼写水平者相比,拼写能力差的人产生的与目标单词视觉上相近的拼写错误明显更多,而语音不受限的拼写错误则更少。两组在语音受限的拼写错误产生方面没有差异。平均拼写水平者比视觉方法更频繁地使用语音方法,而拼写能力差的人则相反。当语音规则发展不完善时,个体更有可能使用正字法技能。

相似文献

1
The development of phonological rules and visual strategies in average and poor spellers.普通拼写者和拼写能力较差者的语音规则及视觉策略发展情况
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Jun;62(1):60-83. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0022.
2
Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.阅读和拼写能力较差的德国儿童的语音工作记忆
Dyslexia. 2008 Nov;14(4):271-90. doi: 10.1002/dys.357.
3
Phonological spelling errors among dyslexic children learning a transparent orthography: the case of Czech.学习透明正字法的阅读障碍儿童的语音拼写错误:以捷克语为例
Dyslexia. 2001 Oct-Dec;7(4):229-45. doi: 10.1002/dys.206.
4
Good phonetic errors in poor spellers are associated with right-handedness and possible weak utilisation of visuospatial abilities.拼写能力差的人所犯的语音错误与惯用右手以及可能较弱的视觉空间能力运用有关。
Cortex. 2008 Jun;44(6):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
5
The relationship between phonological codes on memory and spelling tasks for students with and without learning disabilities.有学习障碍和无学习障碍学生的语音编码与记忆及拼写任务之间的关系。
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Jun-Jul;25(6):396-407. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500608.
6
Predicting early spelling difficulties in children with specific language impairment: a clinical perspective.预测特定语言障碍儿童的早期拼写困难:临床视角。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):2279-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
7
Spelling pronunciation and visual preview both facilitate learning to spell irregular words.拼写发音和视觉预览都有助于学习拼写不规则单词。
Ann Dyslexia. 2006 Dec;56(2):301-18. doi: 10.1007/s11881-006-0013-3.
8
Phonological and orthographic spelling in high-functioning adult dyslexics.高功能成年诵读困难者的语音和正字法拼写
Dyslexia. 2009 May;15(2):105-28. doi: 10.1002/dys.364.
9
The use of orthographic and phonological strategies for the decoding of words in children with developmental dyslexia and average readers.发育性阅读障碍儿童与普通阅读者在使用正字法和语音策略进行单词解码方面的情况。
Dyslexia. 2000 Oct-Dec;6(4):231-47. doi: 10.1002/1099-0909(200010/12)6:4<231::AID-DYS175>3.0.CO;2-3.
10
Is a "Phoenician" reading style superior to a "Chinese" reading style? Evidence from fourth graders.“腓尼基式”阅读风格比“中国式”阅读风格更优越吗?来自四年级学生的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;100(3):186-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
English Word and Pseudoword Spellings and Phonological Awareness: Detailed Comparisons From Three L1 Writing Systems.英语单词和假词拼写与语音意识:来自三种第一语言书写系统的详细比较。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 2;11:1309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01309. eCollection 2020.
2
Derivational Morphology Bridges Phonology and Orthography: Insights Into the Development of Word-Specific Spellings by Superior, Average, and Poor Spellers.派生形态学连接语音学和正字法:对优秀、中等和较差拼写者的单词特定拼写发展的见解。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul 15;51(3):640-654. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00090.
3
Mojibake - The rehearsal of word fragments in verbal recall.
乱码——言语回忆中单词片段的复述
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 16;6:350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00350. eCollection 2015.
4
The timing and strength of regional brain activation associated with word recognition in children with reading difficulties.阅读困难儿童中与单词识别相关的大脑区域激活的时间和强度。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 May 16;5:45. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00045. eCollection 2011.
5
Aspects of fluency in writing.写作中的流畅性方面。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Mar;36(2):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9034-7.