Cohen B, Penning S, Major C, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;88(1):10-3. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00067-1.
To determine if the difference between the abdominal diameter and biparietal diameter (AD-BPD difference), as measured by ultrasound examination, predicts shoulder dystocia in borderline macrosomic infants of diabetic mothers.
A retrospective study was performed of births occurring from January 1990 through June 1995. Eligibility requirements included diabetic pregnancy, ultrasound examination within 2 weeks of delivery, estimated fetal weight of 3800-4200 g, and vaginal delivery. The mean AD-BPD difference was compared in normal deliveries and those complicated by shoulder dystocia, using the Student t test and by multiple regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to determine if an AD-BPD cutoff value could be used clinically to predict shoulder dystocia.
Thirty-one patients, six with dystocia, were eligible for the study. The mean AD-BPD differences for those with and without shoulder dystocia were 3.1 and 2.6 cm, respectively, a statistically significant difference (P = .05). Comparing the groups with and without shoulder dystocia, no significant differences could be found in mean age, parity, weight, birth weight, or gestational age. Shoulder dystocia occurred in six of 20 patients (30%) in whom the AD-BPD difference was at least 2.6 cm but in none of 11 patients in whom it was less than 2.6 cm, also a statistically significant difference (P = .05).
The AD-BPD difference was greater in borderline macrosomic fetuses of diabetic mothers who experienced shoulder dystocia than in those who had uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. Applying an AD-BPD cutoff value of 2.6 cm to this population prospectively would have provided excellent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in identifying those fetuses at high risk for birth injury.
通过超声检查测量腹径与双顶径之差(AD - BPD差值),以确定其能否预测患有糖尿病的临界巨大儿的肩难产。
对1990年1月至1995年6月期间的分娩情况进行回顾性研究。入选标准包括糖尿病妊娠、分娩前2周内进行超声检查、估计胎儿体重为3800 - 4200克以及阴道分娩。采用Student t检验和多元回归分析,比较正常分娩与并发肩难产的分娩中AD - BPD差值的均值。绘制受试者工作特征曲线,以确定AD - BPD临界值是否可用于临床预测肩难产。
31例患者符合研究条件,其中6例发生难产。发生肩难产和未发生肩难产者的AD - BPD差值均值分别为3.1厘米和2.6厘米,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。比较发生和未发生肩难产的两组患者,在平均年龄、产次、体重、出生体重或孕周方面均未发现显著差异。AD - BPD差值至少为2.6厘米的20例患者中有6例(30%)发生肩难产,而AD - BPD差值小于2.6厘米的11例患者中无一例发生肩难产,差异也有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。
发生肩难产的患有糖尿病的临界巨大儿的AD - BPD差值大于未发生复杂阴道分娩的胎儿。对该人群前瞻性地应用2.6厘米的AD - BPD临界值,在识别有高出生损伤风险的胎儿方面将具有出色的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。