Carlesimo G A, Fadda L, Sabbadini M, Caltagirone C
Clinica Neurologica, University of Rome, Italy.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996 May;49(2):315-25. doi: 10.1080/713755622.
This study investigated the hypothesis that discrepant results regarding the recency effect in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients are due to the different scoring procedures used by various authors and/or to the different number of terminal items attributed to the recency part of the curve. Our results indicate that the last two processed words are available to AD patients for recall, just as they are to controls. Words processed slightly earlier are less available to AD patients than to controls, presumably because of the accelerated forgetting rate in demented patients.
本研究调查了这样一种假设,即关于阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者近期效应的不一致结果是由于不同作者使用的评分程序不同和/或归因于曲线近期部分的终端项目数量不同所致。我们的结果表明,AD患者能够像对照组一样回忆起最后处理的两个单词。而对于处理时间稍早的单词,AD患者比对照组更难回忆起来,这可能是因为痴呆患者的遗忘速度加快。