Funnell E
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, U.K.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996 May;49(2):417-46. doi: 10.1080/713755626.
This paper reports a case study of a subject (EP) with a progressive impairment of semantic memory and a coincident surface dyslexia. These two disorders frequently occur together, but their association is not readily explained within current models of reading. This study investigated two theories that offer different principled accounts of this association, the "semantic glue hypothesis" (Patterson & Hodges, 1992) and the "summation hypothesis" (Hillis & Caramazza, 1991) and found both hypotheses wanting. Instead it was shown that when vestiges of word meaning remained, a lexical response was preferred, but when meaning was lost entirely, the evidence derived from sublexical processing appeared to bias selection of the response towards the regularized form.
本文报告了一项针对一名语义记忆进行性受损且同时患有表层失读症的受试者（EP）的案例研究。这两种障碍经常同时出现，但在当前的阅读模型中，它们之间的关联并不容易解释。本研究调查了两种对这种关联提供不同原理性解释的理论，即“语义黏合假说”（帕特森和霍奇斯，1992）和“总和假说”（希利斯和卡拉马扎，1991），结果发现这两种假说都存在不足。相反，研究表明，当词义的痕迹仍然存在时，词汇反应更受青睐，但当词义完全丧失时，来自次词汇加工的证据似乎会使反应选择偏向于规范化形式。
