• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连接主义神经心理学:揭示获得性失读症的根本原因。

Connectionist neuropsychology: uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia.

机构信息

Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, , Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 9;369(1634):20120398. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0398. Print 2014.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2012.0398
PMID:24324241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3866427/
Abstract

Acquired dyslexia offers a unique window on to the nature of the cognitive and neural architecture supporting skilled reading. This paper provides an integrative overview of recent empirical and computational work on acquired dyslexia within the context of the primary systems framework as implemented in connectionist neuropsychological models. This view proposes that damage to general visual, phonological or semantic processing abilities are the root causes of different forms of acquired dyslexia. Recent case-series behavioural evidence concerning pure alexia, phonological dyslexia and surface dyslexia that supports this perspective is presented. Lesion simulations of these findings within connectionist models of reading demonstrate the viability of this approach. The commitment of such models to learnt representations allows them to capture key aspects of performance in each type of acquired dyslexia, particularly the associated non-reading deficits, the role of relearning and the influence of individual differences in the premorbid state of the reading system. Identification of these factors not only advances our understanding of acquired dyslexia and the mechanisms of normal reading but they are also relevant to the complex interactions underpinning developmental reading disorders.

摘要

获得性失读症为我们理解支持熟练阅读的认知和神经结构的本质提供了一个独特的窗口。本文在连接主义神经心理学模型中实施的主要系统框架的背景下,对获得性失读症的最新实证和计算工作进行了综合概述。这一观点认为,一般视觉、语音或语义处理能力的损伤是不同形式获得性失读症的根本原因。本文提出了支持这一观点的关于单纯失读症、语音性失读症和表层失读症的纯行为案例系列证据。在阅读的连接主义模型中对这些发现进行的损伤模拟表明了这种方法的可行性。这些模型对习得表示的承诺允许它们捕捉每种获得性失读症的表现的关键方面,特别是相关的非阅读缺陷、重新学习的作用以及阅读系统的前期状态的个体差异的影响。识别这些因素不仅可以增进我们对获得性失读症和正常阅读机制的理解,而且对发展性阅读障碍的复杂相互作用也具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Connectionist neuropsychology: uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia.连接主义神经心理学:揭示获得性失读症的根本原因。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 9;369(1634):20120398. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0398. Print 2014.
2
Simultaneous simulations of pure, surface and phonological acquired dyslexia within a full computational model of the primary systems hypothesis.在初级系统假说的完整计算模型中对纯、表面和语音获得性阅读障碍进行同步模拟。
Cortex. 2024 Oct;179:112-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Developmental and acquired dyslexias.发育性和获得性阅读障碍。
Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):898-910. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70434-9.
4
The anatomical foundations of acquired reading disorders: a neuropsychological verification of the dual-route model of reading.后天性阅读障碍的解剖学基础:阅读双通路模型的神经心理学验证
Brain Lang. 2014 Jul;134:44-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Acquired dyslexias following temporal lesions.颞叶损伤后获得性阅读障碍
Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;187:277-285. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823493-8.00003-1.
6
Semantic paralexias facilitated by tachistoscopic reading in a patient with impairment of phonological recoding.语音编码受损患者通过速示阅读促成的语义性错读
Acta Neurol (Napoli). 1992 Aug-Dec;14(4-6):578-94.
7
What lies beneath: a comparison of reading aloud in pure alexia and semantic dementia.表象之下:纯失读症与语义性痴呆中大声朗读的比较
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):461-81. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.882300. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Phonological dyslexia: a test case for reading models.语音性阅读障碍:阅读模型的一个测试案例。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Sep;15(9):583-90. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00724.x.
9
Patterns of peripheral paralexia: pure alexia and the forgotten visual dyslexia?周边性错读模式:纯失读症与被遗忘的视觉性阅读障碍?
Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):892-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70433-7.
10
Phonological dyslexia and phonological impairment: an exception to the rule?语音性诵读困难与语音障碍:规则的例外情况?
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(14):2861-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement of cross-language and cross-domain generalization following semantic feature-based anomia treatment in bilingual aphasia.双语失语症患者基于语义特征的命名障碍治疗后的跨语言和跨领域泛化测量。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2025 Jun 26:1-27. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2025.2522196.
2
Appraising Linguistic and Reading Impairments in Kannada-Speaking Persons With Central Alexia.评估患有中枢性失读症的卡纳达语使用者的语言和阅读障碍。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 29;16(6):e63437. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63437. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
AI and Aphasia in the Digital Age: A Critical Review.数字时代的人工智能与失语症:批判性综述
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):383. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040383.
4
Dissociating reading and auditory comprehension in persons with aphasia.区分失语症患者的阅读和听觉理解能力。
Brain Commun. 2024 Mar 25;6(2):fcae102. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae102. eCollection 2024.
5
Sequencing Deficits and Phonological Speech Errors, But Not Articulation Errors, Predict Later Literacy Skills.测序缺陷和语音言语错误,而不是发音错误,可预测以后的读写能力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jun 8;65(6):2081-2097. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00241. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.中风失语症中的两种语音阅读障碍类型。
Brain Commun. 2021 Aug 30;3(3):fcab194. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab194. eCollection 2021.
7
Multiple dimensions underlying the functional organization of the language network.语言网络功能组织的多个维度。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 1;241:118444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118444. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
8
Learning to Read and Dyslexia: From Theory to Intervention Through Personalized Computational Models.学习阅读与诵读困难:从理论到通过个性化计算模型进行干预
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;29(3):293-300. doi: 10.1177/0963721420915873. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
Double Trouble: Visual and Phonological Impairments in English Dyslexic Readers.双重麻烦:英语阅读障碍读者的视觉和语音障碍
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 17;10:2725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02725. eCollection 2019.
10
Are children with developmental dyslexia all the same? A cluster analysis with more than 300 cases.发展性阅读障碍儿童都是一样的吗?一项涉及 300 多例的聚类分析。
Dyslexia. 2019 Aug;25(3):284-295. doi: 10.1002/dys.1629. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
"Shallow draughts intoxicate the brain": lessons from cognitive science for cognitive neuropsychology.“浅尝辄止会使人头脑发昏”:认知科学给认知神经心理学的启示
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):39-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01012.x.
2
Rehabilitation of pure alexia: a review.纯失读症的康复:综述。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(5):755-79. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.809661. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
3
Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition.分布式电路,而非限定的中枢,介导视觉识别。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 May;17(5):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
4
Current themes in neuroimaging studies of reading.阅读的神经影像学研究的当前主题。
Brain Lang. 2013 May;125(2):131-3. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
5
Bilateral hemispheric processing of words and faces: evidence from word impairments in prosopagnosia and face impairments in pure alexia.双侧大脑半球对词语和面孔的加工:失认症患者中词语障碍和面盲症患者中面孔障碍的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Apr;24(4):1102-18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs390. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
6
Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies.认知模型能否解释单词和伪词阅读时大脑的激活?36 项神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):766-91. doi: 10.1037/a0030266. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
7
Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks.发展性阅读障碍的亚型:检验双重通路与联结主义框架的预测。
Cognition. 2013 Jan;126(1):20-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
8
The consequences of progressive phonological impairment for reading aloud.渐进性语音障碍对朗读的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.020. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
9
Efficient visual object and word recognition relies on high spatial frequency coding in the left posterior fusiform gyrus: evidence from a case-series of patients with ventral occipito-temporal cortex damage.高效的视觉物体和文字识别依赖于左后梭状回的高空间频率编码:来自腹侧枕颞叶皮质损伤患者病例系列的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Nov;23(11):2568-80. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs224. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
10
Finite case series or infinite single-case studies? Comments on "Case series investigations in cognitive neuropsychology" by Schwartz and Dell (2010).有限的病例系列或无限的单病例研究?施瓦茨和戴尔(2010)的《认知神经心理学中的病例系列研究》述评。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;28(7):466-74; discussion 515-20. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.671765.