Hoffman Paul, Jefferies Elizabeth, Ehsan Sheeba, Jones Roy W, Lambon Ralph Matthew A
Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, Zochonis Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):747-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
Patients with semantic dementia (SD) make numerous phoneme migration errors when recalling lists of words they no longer fully understand, suggesting that word meaning makes a critical contribution to phoneme binding in verbal short-term memory. Healthy individuals make errors that appear similar when recalling lists of nonwords, which also lack semantic support. Although previous studies have assumed that the errors in these two groups stem from the same underlying cause, they have never been directly compared. We tackled this issue by examining immediate serial recall for SD patients and controls on "pure" word lists and "mixed" lists that contained a mixture of words and nonwords. SD patients were equally poor at pure and mixed lists and made numerous phoneme migration errors in both conditions. In contrast, controls recalled pure lists better than mixed lists and only produced phoneme migrations for mixed lists. We also examined the claim that semantic activation is critical for words in the primacy portion of the list. In fact, the effect of mixed lists was greatest for later serial positions in the control group and in the SD group recall was poorest towards the ends of lists. These results suggest that mixing nonwords with words in healthy participants closely mimics the impact of semantic degradation in SD on word list recall. The study provides converging evidence for the idea that lexical/semantic knowledge is an important source of constraint on phonological coherence, ensuring that phonemes in familiar words are bound to each other and emerge together in recall.
语义性痴呆(SD)患者在回忆那些他们不再完全理解的单词列表时会出现大量音素迁移错误,这表明词义对言语短期记忆中的音素绑定起着关键作用。健康个体在回忆同样缺乏语义支持的非单词列表时也会出现类似的错误。尽管先前的研究认为这两组的错误源于相同的潜在原因,但它们从未被直接比较过。我们通过检查SD患者和对照组对“纯”单词列表以及包含单词和非单词混合的“混合”列表的即时系列回忆来解决这个问题。SD患者在纯列表和混合列表上的表现同样差,并且在两种情况下都出现了大量音素迁移错误。相比之下,对照组回忆纯列表的表现优于混合列表,并且仅在混合列表中出现音素迁移。我们还研究了语义激活对列表首位部分单词至关重要这一说法。事实上,混合列表的影响在对照组的较后系列位置最大,而在SD组中,列表末尾的回忆最差。这些结果表明,在健康参与者中,将非单词与单词混合的情况与SD中语义退化对单词列表回忆的影响非常相似。该研究为词汇/语义知识是语音连贯性的重要约束来源这一观点提供了一致的证据,确保熟悉单词中的音素相互绑定并在回忆中一起出现。