Suppr超能文献

州立医院患者中氯氮平的适用情况。

Clozapine eligibility among state hospital patients.

作者信息

Essock S M, Hargreaves W A, Dohm F A, Goethe J, Carver L, Hipshman L

机构信息

Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford 06106, USA.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(1):15-25. doi: 10.1093/schbul/22.1.15.

Abstract

Connecticut State Hospital's entire resident population (n = 1,300) was screened on an arbitrary target day to determine eligibility for clozapine. Sixty percent of 803 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder diagnoses met Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- approved criteria for clozapine use as judged by review of past medication trial records and by the responsible physicians. Eighty-eight percent of these patients were medically cleared, and of those cleared, 63 percent agreed to clozapine treatment. Of the patients who began a clozapine trial, 76 percent were still taking the drug 12 months later. Preliminary findings from a randomized trial of clozapine versus usual care (n = 227) indicate that discharge rates associated with clozapine and usual care do not differ. Once discharged, however, patients assigned to clozapine are less likely to be readmitted. Hence, clozapine may be more cost-effective than usual care. However, before savings can be realized, State governments will have to make up-front investments of approximately $140 million simply to give patients hospitalized on a single day a year's access to clozapine.

摘要

在一个随机选定的日子,对康涅狄格州立医院的全部住院患者(n = 1300)进行了筛查,以确定其是否符合使用氯氮平的条件。通过查阅既往用药试验记录并经责任医师判断,803例诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍的患者中有60%符合美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的氯氮平使用标准。这些患者中有88%通过了医学评估,在通过评估的患者中,63%同意接受氯氮平治疗。在开始氯氮平试验的患者中,76%在12个月后仍在服用该药。一项氯氮平与常规治疗对比的随机试验(n = 227)的初步结果表明,氯氮平组和常规治疗组的出院率没有差异。然而,出院后,分配到氯氮平组的患者再次入院的可能性较小。因此,氯氮平可能比常规治疗更具成本效益。然而,在实现节省之前,州政府将不得不预先投入约1.4亿美元,只为了让每年某一天住院的患者有机会使用一年的氯氮平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验