Wessely S
Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College School of Medicine, London.
BMJ. 1996 Jul 20;313(7050):158-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7050.158.
Current services for those with mental disorders show two trends. Psychiatric services are becoming concentrated on the care of those with "severe mental illness," largely (but unjustifiably) synonymous with chronic psychosis. The retreat of psychiatry from the care of those with non-psychotic mental disorders has helped the growth of counselling services for these patients. However, there is no evidence that non-directive counselling is effective for such disorders, in contrast to the evidence for the effectiveness of other treatments that are usually delivered by psychologists or community psychiatric nurses. By retreating from the concerns of general practice and general medicine, psychiatry is returning to the days of alienism: in Victorian terms, the care of "the mad." Possible consequences include increasing expectations of psychiatric services that cannot be met, a loss of skills within psychiatry, and increased demoralisation in the mental health services.
目前为精神障碍患者提供的服务呈现出两种趋势。精神科服务正越来越集中于对“严重精神疾病”患者的护理,在很大程度上(但毫无道理地),这与慢性精神病同义。精神病学从非精神病性精神障碍患者护理领域的退出,促进了针对这些患者的咨询服务的发展。然而,没有证据表明非指导性咨询对这类障碍有效,与之形成对比的是,有证据表明通常由心理学家或社区精神科护士提供的其他治疗是有效的。通过背离全科医疗和普通医学所关注的问题,精神病学正在回归到精神病学的时代:用维多利亚时代的说法,就是对“疯子”的护理。可能的后果包括对精神科服务的期望不断增加却无法得到满足、精神病学领域技能的丧失以及精神卫生服务中士气的低落。