Snyder M, Egan E C, Nojima Y
School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1996 Summer;28(2):137-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1996.tb01206.x.
Nurses are giving increasing attention to independent nursing interventions. However, numerous conceptualizations of interventions have evolved and are being used. The purpose of this essay is to examine some of the existing definitions and classification systems for interventions and to provide a rationale for a common universal language for nursing interventions. Definitions and approaches used in five intervention classification systems are examined in relation to inclusion of assessment and evaluation activities, autonomy, level of conceptualization, and inclusiveness of intervention labels. Lack of a common intervention language can deter international collaboration, development of a scientific basis for practice, and reimbursement for nursing services.
护士们越来越关注独立的护理干预措施。然而,关于干预措施的众多概念已经演变并正在被使用。本文的目的是研究一些现有的干预措施定义和分类系统,并为护理干预措施提供一种通用语言的理论依据。结合评估和评价活动的纳入、自主性、概念化水平以及干预标签的包容性,考察了五个干预分类系统中使用的定义和方法。缺乏通用的干预语言可能会阻碍国际合作、实践科学基础的发展以及护理服务的报销。