Suppr超能文献

使用传统吉姆萨染色法和染色体涂染法测量的易位和双着丝粒染色体产率的比较。

Comparison of the yields of translocations and dicentrics measured using conventional Giemsa staining and chromosome painting.

作者信息

Kanda R, Hayata I

机构信息

Safety Analysis Unit and Division of Radiobiology and Biodosimetry, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Biol. 1996 Jun;69(6):701-5. doi: 10.1080/095530096145445.

Abstract

Inconsistent results have been reported regarding the yields of translocations and dicentrics measured using chromosome painting. This inconsistency may be due to mis-scoring of dicentrics as translocations because painting is unsuited to identify centromere positions. In the present study, chromosome aberrations exclusively in the first mitosis after irradiation were analyzed using human peripheral lymphocytes. When identical metaphases were analyzed by both painting and conventional Giemsa staining, which is the most reliable method to locate centromeres, equal frequencies of translocations and dicentrics were observed.

摘要

关于使用染色体涂染法测量易位和双着丝粒的产量,已有不一致的结果报道。这种不一致可能是由于将双着丝粒误判为易位,因为涂染法不适合识别着丝粒位置。在本研究中,使用人外周血淋巴细胞分析了辐射后第一次有丝分裂中单独出现的染色体畸变。当通过涂染法和传统吉姆萨染色法(这是定位着丝粒最可靠的方法)分析相同的中期分裂相时,观察到易位和双着丝粒的频率相等。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验