• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基瓦项目。

The Kiva project.

作者信息

Cardona F A, Davis E R, Switzer P K

机构信息

South Carolina Department of Mental Health, Columbia 29202, USA.

出版信息

J S C Med Assoc. 1996 May;92(5):220-4.

PMID:8691817
Abstract

The treatment program for patients involved in the Kiva Project was individualized. Growth was reinforced and regression was accepted as a natural part of the treatment process. Discharge was never discussed until the patient indicated readiness to leave the hospital and willingness to undertake a particular placement opportunity in the community. Rehospitalization, if it occurred was considered a part of the process and the staff continued to be supportive of the patient regardless of whether or not they remained in the Department of Mental Health system. As of March, 1993, 21 patients had been successfully discharged to the community. Eleven of these patients have been out of the hospital for more than a year, and three for as long as six years. In financial terms, this means a savings in the long-term institutional care of these patients as opposed to more cost-effective outpatient services. The Project currently serves 17 patients. It continues to be a viable treatment modality for the Division of Psychiatric Rehabilitation.

摘要

参与基瓦项目的患者的治疗方案是个性化的。强化成长,并将病情反复视为治疗过程的自然组成部分。在患者表示准备好出院并愿意接受社区中的特定安置机会之前,从不讨论出院事宜。如果再次住院,也被视为治疗过程的一部分,无论患者是否仍留在心理健康系统内,工作人员都会继续支持患者。截至1993年3月,已有21名患者成功出院回归社区。其中11名患者已出院一年多,3名患者已出院长达六年。从经济角度来看,这意味着与更具成本效益的门诊服务相比,这些患者长期机构护理费用的节省。该项目目前为17名患者提供服务。它仍然是精神康复科一种可行的治疗方式。

相似文献

1
The Kiva project.基瓦项目。
J S C Med Assoc. 1996 May;92(5):220-4.
2
The influence of neighborhood environment on treatment continuity and rehospitalization in dually diagnosed patients discharged from acute inpatient care.社区环境对急性住院治疗后出院的双重诊断患者治疗连续性和再次住院的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;166(11):1258-68. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111667. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
3
Do long-term hospitalised patients benefit from discharge into the community?长期住院患者出院回归社区会从中受益吗?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;37(8):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s00127-002-0568-1.
4
[How does the quality of life of long-term hospitalized psychiatric patients change after their discharge into the community?].[长期住院的精神科患者出院回归社区后生活质量如何变化?]
Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Apr;60(4):232-8.
5
[Evaluation of the closure of large psychiatric hospitals in England].[对英格兰大型精神病院关闭情况的评估]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1993;41(4):292-7.
6
Personality, demographic, and intellectual variables associated with readiness for discharge from psychiatric treatment.与精神科治疗出院准备情况相关的人格、人口统计学和智力变量。
J Psychol. 1980 Jan;104(1st Half):67-74.
7
[Reduction of complete inpatient treatment by a system of partial hospitalization, ambulatory and complementary services].
Psychiatr Prax. 1989 Nov;16(6):199-206.
8
[Discharge in inpatient care. Results of a survey. Postscript to part III of the Berlin Deinstitutionalization Study].[住院护理中的出院。一项调查结果。柏林去机构化研究第三部分后记]
Psychiatr Prax. 1999 Jan;26(1):22-4.
9
Three year outcomes of an early intervention for psychosis service as compared with treatment as usual for first psychotic episodes in a standard community mental health team. Preliminary results.与标准社区心理健康团队中首次精神病发作的常规治疗相比,精神病早期干预服务的三年结果。初步结果。
Psychiatr Danub. 2007 Jun;19(1-2):10-9.
10
[Predictors of the discharge status in acute day-hospital and inpatient care - a comparison between the two settings within a randomised controlled trial].[急性日间医院和住院护理中出院状态的预测因素——随机对照试验中两种环境的比较]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 Jul;33(5):226-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-834757.