Mersch-Sundermann V, Klopman G, Rosenkranz H S
Department of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, Germany.
Mutat Res. 1996 Jun;340(2-3):81-91. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1110(96)90041-x.
Analyses of a data base consisting of 461 chemicals tested in the SOS chromotest with MULTICASE resulted in the development of an SAR model that displayed a highly significant concordance (87.3%) between experimental and predicted results of chemicals not included in the model. An analysis of the nature of the biophores and their modulators revealed that electrophilicity and structural features affecting: (a) accessibility of the electrophile to the nucleophilic site on the DNA; and (b) the bulkiness of the DNA adduct were factors determining the probability that a chemical would induce DNA error prone repair and if so the extent of this activity. Additional analyses indicated that there were significant mechanistic similarities between the SOS chromotest and mutations in Salmonella as determined in the standard ('Ames') assay.
对一个由461种在SOS色变试验中用MULTICASE测试的化学物质组成的数据库进行分析,得出了一个构效关系模型,该模型显示,未纳入模型的化学物质的实验结果与预测结果之间具有高度显著的一致性(87.3%)。对生物基团及其调节剂的性质进行分析后发现,亲电性以及影响以下两方面的结构特征:(a)亲电试剂与DNA上亲核位点的可及性;(b)DNA加合物的大小,是决定一种化学物质是否会诱导DNA易错修复以及若会诱导则该活性程度的因素。进一步分析表明,SOS色变试验与标准(“艾姆斯”)试验中所测定的沙门氏菌突变之间存在显著的机制相似性。