Bartlett R J, Hill C A, Devlin R, Gardiner E D
Department of Radiology, Royal Hull Hospitals, Hull, UK.
Neuroradiology. 1996 Feb;38(2):142-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00604801.
A prospective comparison was made of standard two-dimensional MRI sequences, at both high and midfield strength, with CT myelography in 23 patients with cervical spondylosis. MRI is adequate for assessment of cord compression, where high field strength is superior to midfield strength. MRI using 4-mm sections is inadequate for presurgical assessment of root compression. It remains to be proven whether thin-section white-CSF volume sequences or gadolinium-enhanced volume studies can replace CT myelography.
对23例颈椎病患者在高场强和中场强下的标准二维MRI序列与CT脊髓造影进行了前瞻性比较。MRI足以评估脊髓受压情况,高场强优于中场强。使用4毫米层厚的MRI对于术前评估神经根受压并不充分。薄层白质-脑脊液容积序列或钆增强容积研究能否取代CT脊髓造影仍有待证实。