Perneczky G, Böck F W, Neuhold A, Stiskal M
Neurosurgical Department, Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, Wien, Austria.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;116(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01541252.
In a prospective study of 63 surgical patients cervical myelography was compared with MRI to establish the relative value of the 2 diagnostic procedures in patient selection for surgery of ruptured cervical discs and bony nerve root compression. While MRI in the T1-weighted and gradient echo modes matched the diagnostic accuracy of invasive myelography (95%), T1 and T2-weighted MRI images alone were associated with an error rate of 10%. In patients with medial protrusion myelography did not always show the true extent of compression, whereas MRI tended to miss small laterally protruding disc fragments. Cervical myelography continues to have a place in the diagnosis of cervical disc disease, whenever clinical signs and symptoms do not agree with MRI data.
在一项针对63例外科手术患者的前瞻性研究中,对颈椎脊髓造影和磁共振成像(MRI)进行了比较,以确定这两种诊断方法在选择颈椎间盘破裂和骨性神经根受压手术患者时的相对价值。虽然T1加权和梯度回波模式下的MRI与侵入性脊髓造影的诊断准确性相当(95%),但仅T1和T2加权MRI图像的错误率为10%。在内侧突出的患者中,脊髓造影并不总是能显示出真正的压迫程度,而MRI往往会遗漏小的外侧突出椎间盘碎片。只要临床体征和症状与MRI数据不一致,颈椎脊髓造影在颈椎间盘疾病的诊断中仍占有一席之地。