• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[住院护理单元人员排班的患者活动水平计划]

[Patient activity level plans for personnel scheduling in nursing in-patient units].

作者信息

van Wyk A J, Muller M E

出版信息

Curationis. 1995 Dec;18(4):31-7.

PMID:8697535
Abstract

This study of patient activity level plans (PALP) to determine nursing levels for in-patients units was carried out by means of an exploratory, descriptive instrumental study within the context of a nursing situation. With the literature study serving as background, a patient activity level plan (PALP) was designed, according to accepted criteria, to find data on which to base post determination of nursing staff. This study was done at a private research hospital in Johannesburg where all the patients and nursing staff (first- as well as second-in-charge) were involved. The PALP-instrument was designed by the researcher, and under supervision of the researcher it was implemented in seven nursing units in the hospital. (The instrument proved to be highly reliable p = 0.999). The difference between nursing post determination as recommended and determined by PALP, and nursing post determination as determined by means of a pragmatic subjective approach by the nursing service manager of the hospital, proved to be statistically insignificant. The PALP instrument showed, however, that more nursing staff were needed in four of the seven units. The quality of the nursing care was not investigated nor was a productivity study carried out. The total difference between the recommended and actual nursing hours needed for all the nursing units shows a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001) on a 1% significance level. The instrument proved to be easily comprehended, easily implemented and relevant to its purpose. It also shows a high inter-rator reliability (a chronbach alpha value of 0.999). Thus a reliable PALP-instrument was developed and successfully implemented at a research hospital for the determination of nursing posts. The most significant recommendations include national standardization of the PALP-instrument in hospitals and refining and testing of the PALP-instrument in other clinical areas e.g. out-patients and critical care units. This instrument could also contribute towards a more cost-effective post determination in nursing.

摘要

这项关于患者活动水平计划(PALP)以确定住院病房护理等级的研究,是在护理情境下通过探索性、描述性工具性研究开展的。以文献研究为背景,依据公认标准设计了患者活动水平计划(PALP),以获取用于确定护理人员数量的数据。该研究在约翰内斯堡的一家私立研究医院进行,所有患者及护理人员(包括主管和副主管)均参与其中。PALP工具由研究者设计,并在研究者的监督下在医院的七个护理单元实施。(该工具被证明具有高度可靠性,p = 0.999)。PALP推荐并确定的护理岗位数量与医院护理服务经理通过务实主观方法确定的护理岗位数量之间的差异,在统计学上不显著。然而,PALP工具显示,七个单元中有四个单元需要更多护理人员。研究未对护理质量进行调查,也未开展生产率研究。所有护理单元推荐的与实际所需护理时长的总体差异在1%显著性水平上显示出统计学显著差异(p = 0.0001)。该工具被证明易于理解、易于实施且与目标相关。它还显示出较高的评分者间信度(克朗巴哈α值为0.999)。因此,开发了一种可靠的PALP工具,并在一家研究医院成功实施以确定护理岗位。最重要的建议包括在医院对PALP工具进行国家标准化,以及在其他临床领域(如门诊和重症监护病房)对PALP工具进行完善和测试。该工具还可为护理岗位确定中更具成本效益的决策做出贡献。

相似文献

1
[Patient activity level plans for personnel scheduling in nursing in-patient units].[住院护理单元人员排班的患者活动水平计划]
Curationis. 1995 Dec;18(4):31-7.
2
Patient requirements for nursing care: the development of an instrument.患者护理需求:一种工具的开发
Can J Nurs Adm. 1998 Jan-Feb;11(1):31-51.
3
An evaluation of an acuity system as it applies to a cardiac catheterization laboratory.对一种应用于心脏导管实验室的 acuity 系统的评估。
Comput Nurs. 1999 May-Jun;17(3):129-34.
4
Assessment of nursing management and utilization of nursing resources with the RAFAELA patient classification system--case study from the general wards of one central hospital.使用拉斐拉患者分类系统评估护理管理及护理资源利用情况——来自一家中心医院普通病房的案例研究
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):674-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01139.x.
5
Development of a nursing workload measurement instrument in burn care.烧伤护理中护理工作量测量工具的研制。
Burns. 2009 Nov;35(7):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
6
Assessing nursing staffing ratios: variability in workload intensity.评估护理人员配置比例:工作量强度的差异
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2007 Feb;8(1):7-19. doi: 10.1177/1527154407300999.
7
Are nurses' assessments of their workload affected by non-patient factors? An analysis of the RAFAELA system.护士对其工作量的评估会受到非患者因素的影响吗?对拉斐拉系统的分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Jul;15(5):490-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00645.x.
8
Measuring nursing workload in neonatal intensive care.测量新生儿重症监护中的护理工作量。
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Apr;14(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00609.x.
9
Does the APACHE II scoring system equate with the Nottingham Patient Dependency System? Can these systems be used to determine nursing workload and skill mix?急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)与诺丁汉患者依赖度系统等同吗?这些系统能用于确定护理工作量和技能组合吗?
Nurs Crit Care. 1997 Mar-Apr;2(2):59, 62-3.
10
Validation of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care instrument.《巴塞尔护理服务配给程度量表》的验证
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):416-24. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299853.52429.62.