• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effectiveness of targeting the vulnerability factors of depression in cognitive therapy.

作者信息

Hayes A M, Castonguay L G, Goldfried M R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124-0721, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):623-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.623.

DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.623
PMID:8698959
Abstract

I. H. Gotlib and C.L. Hammen's (1992) psychopathology model of depression was used as a conceptual framework for studying the process of change in an effective course of cognitive therapy (CT) for depression. Archived CT transcripts from 30 depressed outpatients in the Cognitive-Pharmaco-therapy Treatment project (S. D. Hollon et al., 1992) were studied. An observational coding system was used to assess whether therapists focused on the cognitive, interpersonal, and developmental vulnerabilities of depression and whether these interventions were associated with symptom reduction. Therapists maintained a primarily cognitive focus, but it was interventions that addressed the interpersonal and developmental domains that were associated with improvement. A developmental focus also predicted a longer time of recovery and better global functioning over the 24-month followup period. These findings are consistent with recent theoretical developments in cognitive therapy and with the psychopathology research on depression.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of targeting the vulnerability factors of depression in cognitive therapy.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):623-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.623.
2
The role of avoidance and obsessiveness in matching patients to cognitive and interpersonal psychotherapy: empirical findings from the treatment for depression collaborative research program.回避和强迫观念在为患者匹配认知与人际心理治疗中的作用:抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的实证结果
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Oct;64(5):951-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.5.951.
3
The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.治疗联盟在心理治疗和药物治疗结果中的作用:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的研究结果
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):532-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.532.
4
Dynamic systems theory as a paradigm for the study of change in psychotherapy: an application to cognitive therapy for depression.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Dec;66(6):939-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.6.939.
5
The treatment of depression with group behavioural-cognitive therapy and imipramine.采用团体行为认知疗法和丙咪嗪治疗抑郁症。
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;39(7):387-90. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900701.
6
Predicting the effect of cognitive therapy for depression: a study of unique and common factors.预测认知疗法对抑郁症的疗效:独特因素与共同因素的研究
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):497-504.
7
How does cognitive therapy work? Cognitive change and symptom change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression.认知疗法如何起作用?认知疗法与药物疗法治疗抑郁症时的认知改变和症状改变。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Dec;58(6):862-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.58.6.862.
8
National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments.国家心理健康研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目。治疗的总体有效性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):971-82; discussion 983. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002.
9
Does learned resourcefulness predict response to cognitive therapy in depressed outpatients?习得性足智多谋能否预测抑郁症门诊患者对认知疗法的反应?
J Affect Disord. 1991 Dec;23(4):223-9. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(91)90104-z.
10
Interpersonal factors in brief treatment of depression: further analyses of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.抑郁症简短治疗中的人际因素:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的进一步分析
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):162-71. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.1.162.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach.基于精神分析的摇头丸辅助治疗病理性自恋:一种新的理论方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 2;16:1529427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1529427. eCollection 2025.
2
Behavioral Activation Contributed to the Total Reduction of Depression Symptoms in the Smartphone-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Trial.行为激活有助于基于智能手机的认知行为疗法中抑郁症状的总体减轻:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;17(7-9):21-25.
3
Effects of the therapist's statements on the patient's outcome and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review.
治疗师的陈述对患者结局和治疗联盟的影响:系统评价。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Mar;27(2):168-178. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2416. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
4
The Neurobiological Underpinnings of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy.精神分析理论与治疗的神经生物学基础
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;12:294. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00294. eCollection 2018.
5
The scientific standing of psychoanalysis.精神分析的科学地位。
BJPsych Int. 2018 Feb;15(1):5-8. doi: 10.1192/bji.2017.4.
6
Components Analyses of a School-Based Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Youth Depression.基于学校的认知行为治疗青少年抑郁症的成分分析。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S180-S193. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280800. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
7
Losing Your Gut Feelings. Intuition in Depression.失去直觉:抑郁症中的直觉
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 23;7:1291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01291. eCollection 2016.
8
Non-suicidal self-injury and emotion regulation: a review on facial emotion recognition and facial mimicry.非自杀性自伤与情绪调节:面部情绪识别和面部模仿的研究综述。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2013 Feb 20;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-7-5.
9
Interpersonal accuracy of interventions and the outcome of cognitive and interpersonal therapies for depression.干预的人际准确性与认知和人际治疗抑郁症的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):420-8. doi: 10.1037/a0019549.
10
When adolescents disagree with others about their symptoms: differences in attachment organization as an explanation of discrepancies between adolescent, parent, and peer reports of behavior problems.当青少年与他人对自身症状存在分歧时:依恋组织的差异作为青少年、父母和同伴关于行为问题报告之间差异的一种解释。
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Spring;17(2):509-28. doi: 10.1017/s0954579405050248.