• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回避和强迫观念在为患者匹配认知与人际心理治疗中的作用:抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的实证结果

The role of avoidance and obsessiveness in matching patients to cognitive and interpersonal psychotherapy: empirical findings from the treatment for depression collaborative research program.

作者信息

Barber J P, Muenz L R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Oct;64(5):951-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.5.951.

DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.64.5.951
PMID:8916624
Abstract

This article examines the hypothesis that cognitive therapy (CT) is more effective than interpersonal therapy (IPT) for treatment of depressed patients with an elevated level of avoidant personality, whereas the reverse holds for depressed patients with elevated level of obsessive personality. This hypothesis was derived in part from the preliminary results of previous unpublished pilot work, which examined the course of dynamic and cognitive therapies for avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. With the "completer" data set available from the Treatment for Depression Collaborative Research Program (I. Elkin et al., 1989), the expected significant interactions between treatment (CT vs. IPT) and avoidance and between treatment and obsessiveness were found. A significant interaction was also found between marital status and treatment, indicating that married patients did better after CT, whereas single and noncohabiting patients improved more after IPT. Similar patterns of results were found using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Beck Depression Inventory. A matching factor formula of patients to CT vs. IPT is presented.

摘要

本文检验了以下假设

认知疗法(CT)在治疗回避型人格水平较高的抑郁症患者时比人际疗法(IPT)更有效,而在治疗强迫型人格水平较高的抑郁症患者时情况则相反。这一假设部分源于之前未发表的初步试点工作结果,该工作研究了针对回避型和强迫型人格障碍的动力疗法和认知疗法的疗程。利用抑郁症协作研究项目(I. 埃尔金等人,1989年)提供的“完成者”数据集,发现了治疗(CT与IPT)与回避之间以及治疗与强迫之间预期的显著交互作用。还发现婚姻状况与治疗之间存在显著交互作用,表明已婚患者在接受CT治疗后效果更好,而单身和非同居患者在接受IPT治疗后改善更多。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表和贝克抑郁量表也发现了类似的结果模式。本文还给出了患者与CT或IPT匹配的因素公式。

相似文献

1
The role of avoidance and obsessiveness in matching patients to cognitive and interpersonal psychotherapy: empirical findings from the treatment for depression collaborative research program.回避和强迫观念在为患者匹配认知与人际心理治疗中的作用:抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的实证结果
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Oct;64(5):951-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.5.951.
2
Attachment as moderator of treatment outcome in major depression: a randomized control trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus cognitive behavior therapy.依恋作为重度抑郁症治疗结果的调节因素:人际心理治疗与认知行为治疗的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1041-54. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1041.
3
The role of avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder traits in matching patients with major depression to cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy: A replication study.回避型和强迫型人格障碍特质在重度抑郁症患者与认知行为疗法和心理动力疗法匹配中的作用:一项重复研究
J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 15;205:400-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
Patient predictors of response to psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy: findings in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.心理治疗和药物治疗反应的患者预测因素:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;148(8):997-1008. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.8.997.
5
The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.治疗联盟在心理治疗和药物治疗结果中的作用:美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目的研究结果
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):532-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.532.
6
Effectiveness of targeting the vulnerability factors of depression in cognitive therapy.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Jun;64(3):623-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.3.623.
7
Symptom specificity in the acute treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: a re-analysis of the treatment of depression collaborative research program.在重度抑郁障碍的急性期治疗中症状的特异性:对抑郁症治疗合作研究计划的再分析。
J Affect Disord. 2012 Mar;137(1-3):87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
8
Initial severity and differential treatment outcome in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.美国国立精神卫生研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目中的初始严重程度及差异治疗结果
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Oct;63(5):841-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.5.841.
9
Impact of Cluster C personality disorders on outcomes of contrasting brief psychotherapies for depression.C类人格障碍对抑郁症不同简短心理治疗结果的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Dec;63(6):997-1004. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.6.997.
10
National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. General effectiveness of treatments.国家心理健康研究所抑郁症治疗协作研究项目。治疗的总体有效性。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;46(11):971-82; discussion 983. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrasting Individual-Specific Resilience and Compensation Personalization Frameworks: The Case of Rumination.对比个体特异性复原力和补偿个性化框架:以反刍思维为例。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Mar 3;5(3):100478. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100478. eCollection 2025 May.
2
A Tutorial Introduction to Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation with Meta-learners.元学习的异质处理效应估计教程简介。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):650-673. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01303-9. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Congruency of multimodal data-driven personalization with shared decision-making for StayFine: individualized app-based relapse prevention for anxiety and depression in young people.
多模态数据驱动的个性化与共同决策在StayFine中的一致性:基于应用程序的青少年焦虑和抑郁复发预防个性化方案
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 29;14:1229713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1229713. eCollection 2023.
4
Exploring personalized psychotherapy for depression: A system dynamics approach.探索抑郁症的个性化心理治疗:系统动力学方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276441. eCollection 2022.
5
Investigating patient-specific mechanisms of change in SET vs. EFT for depression: study protocol for a mechanistic randomized controlled trial.探究针对抑郁症的接纳与承诺疗法(SET)与情绪聚焦疗法(EFT)中特定患者的改变机制:一项机制性随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03279-y.
6
Feasibility of Present-Centered Therapy for Prolonged Grief Disorder: Results of a Pilot Study.以当下为中心疗法治疗持续性悲伤障碍的可行性:一项试点研究的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 15;12:534664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.534664. eCollection 2021.
7
Mechanisms of change and heterogeneous treatment effects in psychodynamic and cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial.动力性心理治疗和认知行为治疗对抑郁症患者的疗效机制及异质性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00517-6.
8
Precision medicine for long-term depression outcomes using the Personalized Advantage Index approach: cognitive therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy?采用个性化优势指数方法对长期抑郁结局进行精准医疗:认知疗法还是人际心理治疗?
Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;51(2):279-289. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719003192. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
In-session emotional expression predicts symptomatic and panic-specific reflective functioning improvements in panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy.治疗过程中的情绪表达可预测惊恐障碍聚焦心理动力学治疗中症状和惊恐特异性反省功能的改善。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2019 Dec;56(4):514-525. doi: 10.1037/pst0000215. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
Dismantling, personalising and optimising internet cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: a study protocol for individual participant data component network meta-analysis.拆解、个性化和优化互联网认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的研究方案:一项个体参与者数据成分网络荟萃分析研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;8(11):e026137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026137.