Barber J P, Muenz L R
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Oct;64(5):951-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.5.951.
This article examines the hypothesis that cognitive therapy (CT) is more effective than interpersonal therapy (IPT) for treatment of depressed patients with an elevated level of avoidant personality, whereas the reverse holds for depressed patients with elevated level of obsessive personality. This hypothesis was derived in part from the preliminary results of previous unpublished pilot work, which examined the course of dynamic and cognitive therapies for avoidant and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. With the "completer" data set available from the Treatment for Depression Collaborative Research Program (I. Elkin et al., 1989), the expected significant interactions between treatment (CT vs. IPT) and avoidance and between treatment and obsessiveness were found. A significant interaction was also found between marital status and treatment, indicating that married patients did better after CT, whereas single and noncohabiting patients improved more after IPT. Similar patterns of results were found using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Beck Depression Inventory. A matching factor formula of patients to CT vs. IPT is presented.
认知疗法(CT)在治疗回避型人格水平较高的抑郁症患者时比人际疗法(IPT)更有效,而在治疗强迫型人格水平较高的抑郁症患者时情况则相反。这一假设部分源于之前未发表的初步试点工作结果,该工作研究了针对回避型和强迫型人格障碍的动力疗法和认知疗法的疗程。利用抑郁症协作研究项目(I. 埃尔金等人,1989年)提供的“完成者”数据集,发现了治疗(CT与IPT)与回避之间以及治疗与强迫之间预期的显著交互作用。还发现婚姻状况与治疗之间存在显著交互作用,表明已婚患者在接受CT治疗后效果更好,而单身和非同居患者在接受IPT治疗后改善更多。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表和贝克抑郁量表也发现了类似的结果模式。本文还给出了患者与CT或IPT匹配的因素公式。