Verhey F R, Lodder J, Rozendaal N, Jolles J
Department of Psychiatry, State University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Neuroepidemiology. 1996;15(3):166-72. doi: 10.1159/000109904.
At least seven different sets of criteria are commonly used for the diagnosis of vascular dementia (VaD). These are the ischemic scales (IS) of Hachinski, Rosen and Loeb, the criteria from the DSM-III-R, those outlined by Erkinjuntti et al., the State of California Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers (ADDTC) and the international workgroup of the American National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the European "Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences'. To investigate the differences and similarities of these criteria, we applied them to a sample of 124 demented patients from the Maastricht Memory Clinic. Only 8 patients were diagnosed as having VaD by all criteria. Depending on which criteria were used, the frequencies of VaD and Alzheimer's disease (AD) ranged from 6 to 32%, and from 48 to 56%, respectively. The IS of Hachinski and Rosen resulted in the highest frequencies of VaD, whereas the criteria of Erkinjuntti and those from the ADDTC and the NINDS workgroup yielded the lowest. The number of patients with VaD was reduced substantially when neuroradiological data and the temporal relationship between stroke and dementia were taken into consideration. We conclude that the seven sets of criteria cannot be regarded as interchangeable. Differences in the criteria for VaD and AD may be an overlooked source of interstudy variance
目前至少有七套不同的标准常用于诊断血管性痴呆(VaD)。这些标准包括哈钦斯基、罗森和勒布的缺血量表(IS)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中的标准、埃尔金尤蒂等人提出的标准、加利福尼亚州阿尔茨海默病诊断与治疗中心(ADDTC)的标准以及美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所(NINDS)和欧洲“国际神经科学研究与教育协会”的国际工作组的标准。为了研究这些标准之间的异同,我们将它们应用于马斯特里赫特记忆诊所的124名痴呆患者样本。所有标准均诊断为VaD的患者仅8例。根据所使用的标准不同,VaD和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断频率分别为6%至32%和48%至56%。哈钦斯基和罗森的缺血量表诊断出的VaD频率最高,而埃尔金尤蒂的标准以及ADDTC和NINDS工作组的标准诊断出的VaD频率最低。当考虑神经放射学数据以及中风与痴呆之间的时间关系时,VaD患者的数量大幅减少。我们得出结论,这七套标准不能被视为可相互替换的。VaD和AD诊断标准的差异可能是研究间差异被忽视的一个来源。