• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

试产与选择性二次剖宫产的比较。

Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.

作者信息

McMahon M J, Luther E R, Bowes W A, Olshan A F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7570, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 5;335(10):689-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351001.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199609053351001
PMID:8703167
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to reduce the rate of cesarean section, obstetricians now offer a trial of labor to pregnant women who have had a previous cesarean section. Although a trial of labor is usually successful and is relatively safe, few studies have directly addressed the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with this method of delivery.

METHODS

We performed a population-based, longitudinal study of 6138 women in Nova Scotia who had previously undergone cesarean section and had delivered a singleton live infant in the period from 1986 through 1992.

RESULTS

A total of 3249 women elected a trial of labor, and 2889 women chose to undergo a second cesarean section. There were no maternal deaths. The overall rate of maternal morbidity was 8.1 percent; 1.3 percent had major complications (a need for hysterectomy, uterine rupture, or operative injury) and 6.9 percent had minor complications (puerperal fever, a need for blood transfusion, or abdominal-wound infection). Although the overall rate of maternal complications did not differ significantly between women who chose a trial of labor and the women who elected cesarean section (odds ratio for the trial-of-labor group, 0.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.1), major complications were nearly twice as likely among women undergoing a trial of labor (odds ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.0). Apgar scores, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and perinatal mortality were similar among the infants whose mothers had a trial of labor and those whose mothers underwent elective cesarean section.

CONCLUSION

Among pregnant women who have had a cesarean section, major maternal complications are almost twice as likely among those whose deliveries are managed with a trial of labor as among those who undergo an elective second cesarean section.

摘要

背景

为降低剖宫产率,产科医生现向曾行剖宫产的孕妇提供试产机会。尽管试产通常成功且相对安全,但很少有研究直接探讨这种分娩方式相关的孕产妇及围产儿发病率和死亡率。

方法

我们对新斯科舍省6138名曾行剖宫产且在1986年至1992年期间分娩单胎活婴的妇女进行了一项基于人群的纵向研究。

结果

共有3249名妇女选择试产,2889名妇女选择再次剖宫产。无孕产妇死亡。孕产妇总体发病率为8.1%;1.3%发生严重并发症(需要行子宫切除术、子宫破裂或手术损伤),6.9%发生轻微并发症(产褥热、需要输血或腹部伤口感染)。尽管选择试产的妇女与选择剖宫产的妇女之间孕产妇并发症的总体发生率无显著差异(试产组优势比为0.9;95%置信区间为0.8至1.1),但试产妇女发生严重并发症的可能性几乎是剖宫产妇女的两倍(优势比为1.8;95%置信区间为1.1至3.0)。母亲接受试产的婴儿与母亲接受择期剖宫产的婴儿在阿氏评分、入住新生儿重症监护病房情况及围产儿死亡率方面相似。

结论

在曾行剖宫产的孕妇中,经试产分娩的孕妇发生严重孕产妇并发症的可能性几乎是接受择期再次剖宫产孕妇的两倍。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.试产与选择性二次剖宫产的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 5;335(10):689-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351001.
2
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.既往剖宫产术后试产相关的母儿结局
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
3
The safety of a trial of labor after cesarean section in a grandmultiparous population.经产妇行剖宫产术后试产的安全性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0490-6. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
4
Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.有多次和单次既往剖宫产史的女性试产时子宫破裂的风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):12-20. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3.
5
Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?再次剖宫产:病历中记录了哪些指征?
Birth. 2006 Mar;33(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00068.x.
6
Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section.有剖宫产史的极度肥胖孕妇的分娩方式:阴道分娩与再次剖宫产
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;185(2):349-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116729.
7
[Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].[剖宫产瘢痕子宫产妇分娩方式的预测因素]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999 Jul;28(4):358-68.
8
Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery.肥胖症产妇及有剖宫产史产妇的引产或再次剖宫产试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):125-33. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000223871.69852.31.
9
Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.选择性重复剖宫产与试产:1989年至1999年文献的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;183(5):1187-97. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108890.
10
Trial of labor after cesarean section in twin pregnancies: maternal and neonatal safety.双胎妊娠剖宫产术后阴道试产:母儿安全性
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Jun;23(6):550-4. doi: 10.3109/14767050903156700.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse maternal outcomes among women who gave birth at public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚东部公立医院分娩妇女的不良孕产妇结局:一项横断面研究。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Mar 28;6:1569815. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1569815. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring barriers and facilitators of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), awareness, and preferences among females in Western Saudi Arabia.探索沙特阿拉伯西部女性剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的障碍与促进因素、认知情况及偏好。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jan;14(1):139-148. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_946_24. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
3
Safety of a trial of labor after cesarean in kidney and liver transplant recipients: A multicenter cohort study.
肾和肝移植受者剖宫产术后阴道试产的安全性:一项多中心队列研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):471-477. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70013. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Inter-pregnancy interval and uterine rupture during a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery and no previous vaginal births: a retrospective population-based cohort study.既往有一次剖宫产史且无阴道分娩史的产妇在试产期间的妊娠间隔与子宫破裂:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 21;80:103071. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103071. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
The value of routine hemoglobin level evaluation following elective cesarean section: Is it worthwhile?择期剖宫产术后常规评估血红蛋白水平的价值:是否值得?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):205-209. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15835. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
Factors Affecting Elective and Non-elective Cesarean Sections: A Multinomial Regression Analysis Using Robson's Classification in a Southeast European Country.影响选择性剖宫产和非选择性剖宫产的因素:在一个东南欧国家使用罗布森分类法进行的多项回归分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 10;16(6):e62038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62038. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Frequency of Maternal Anemia in Patients Presenting With Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.胎膜早破患者中母体贫血的发生率
Cureus. 2024 Jan 26;16(1):e52973. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52973. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Development of a multivariate predictive nomogram among women with antepartum fetal death diagnosed at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation for outcome of TOLAC.孕34周及以上诊断为产前胎儿死亡的女性中,用于预测经阴道分娩成功率(TOLAC)结局的多变量预测列线图的开发。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07264-6. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
9
Diagnosis and Management of Uterine Rupture in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Case Series and Literature Review.妊娠晚期子宫破裂的诊断与处理:病例系列及文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 2;15(6):e39861. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39861. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
The association between trial of labor after cesarean in obese patients and adverse maternal outcomes.剖宫产后试产与肥胖产妇不良母婴结局的关系。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2421-2426. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07113-6. Epub 2023 Jun 30.