Bodner Glen E, Masson Michael E J
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03195815.
Bodner and Masson (2001) reported that masked repetition priming of lexical decisions is often greater when the repetition primes appear on a high, rather than a low, proportion of trials. They suggested that processing episodes are constructed for masked primes and that recruitment of those episodes is affected by the probability that the prime will be useful for processing the target. If context-sensitive recruitment of primes is a general mechanism, a similar effect should also occur in a nonbinary response task. In accord with this hypothesis, using the naming task and a 45-msec prime duration, we show that masked repetition priming effects for uppercase words, case-alternated words, and pseudohomophones were greater when .8 rather than .2 of the trials involved repetition (vs. unrelated) primes. Prime validity effects are consistent with a memory recruitment view of priming but may be difficult to explain using activation-based mechanisms.
博德纳和马森(2001年)报告称,当重复启动词出现在高比例而非低比例的试验中时,词汇判断的掩蔽重复启动效应通常更大。他们认为,针对掩蔽启动词构建了加工片段,并且这些片段的招募受到启动词对加工目标有用的概率的影响。如果启动词的上下文敏感招募是一种普遍机制,那么在非二元反应任务中也应该会出现类似的效应。根据这一假设,使用命名任务和45毫秒的启动词持续时间,我们发现,当80%而非20%的试验涉及重复(与不相关)启动词时,大写单词、大小写交替单词和假同音异形词的掩蔽重复启动效应更大。启动词有效性效应与启动的记忆招募观点一致,但使用基于激活的机制可能难以解释。