• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过支气管镜检查对中重度急性社区获得性肺炎的研究。对一家综合医院收治的193例患者的分析]

[Acute community-acquired pneumonia of moderate and grave severity investigated by bronchoscopy. Analysis of 193 cases hospitalized in a general hospital].

作者信息

Vivès L, Biel P, Maler G, Labonne F, Lecoules N, Dufour M, Marignol G, Vanche J

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie et Laboratoires Microbiologiques, Centres Hopitaliers Généraux, Saint-Gaudens.

出版信息

Rev Mal Respir. 1996;13(2):175-82.

PMID:8711237
Abstract

Between February 1989 and June 1994 193 cases of acute community acquired pneumonia (PAC) which were of intermediate or great severity were admitted to two hospitals in the South West of France. These patients were explored using bronchofibroscopy (FB) with a protected brush (BP) and alveolar microlavage (MLBA) and quantitative cultures were performed, also there were other specimens taken in a regular fashion. The percentage of positive examinations was 60% for brushings (BP), 59% for MLBA and 21% for blood cultures and 16% for serological tests. An aetiology was determined in 137 cases (70.9%). The organisms recovered were Streptococcus pneumoniae (49.6%), gram negative bacilli (17.4%), Haemophilus influenzae (11.7%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (4.4%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (4.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (3.6%), Chlamydia pneumoniae (2.2%), Legionella pneumophila (0.7%), and various 5.8%. The overall mortality was 15% despite immediate antibiotics based on the likely organism in 88% of cases. The study of prognostic factors confirmed the Fine score system (determined a posteriori) which constitutes a useful and practical index determining the management of PAC. On the other hand the role of bacteriological documentation in improving the vital prognosis remains to be confirmed. If bronchofibroscopy has appeared to us as a safe and useful means of investigation, the management of these disease remains to specified. We suggest that its use is reserved for subjects with life threatening disease (a Fine score equal to or greater than 3) or for those patients who are likely to have unusual germs: failure of previous antibiotics, diabetes, malnourishment, cancer, airflow obstruction and inhalation.

摘要

1989年2月至1994年6月期间,193例中度或重度急性社区获得性肺炎(PAC)患者被收治到法国西南部的两家医院。对这些患者进行了纤维支气管镜检查(FB),使用了防污染毛刷(BP)和肺泡灌洗(MLBA)并进行了定量培养,同时还定期采集了其他标本。毛刷检查(BP)的阳性检出率为60%,肺泡灌洗(MLBA)为59%,血培养为21%,血清学检测为16%。137例(70.9%)患者明确了病因。分离出的病原体有肺炎链球菌(49.6%)、革兰氏阴性杆菌(17.4%)、流感嗜血杆菌(11.7%)、肺炎支原体(4.4%)、结核分枝杆菌(4.4%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(3.6%)、肺炎衣原体(2.2%)、嗜肺军团菌(0.7%)以及其他各种病原体(5.8%)。尽管88%的病例根据可能的病原体立即使用了抗生素,但总体死亡率仍为15%。对预后因素的研究证实了Fine评分系统(事后确定),该系统构成了一个有用且实用的指标,可用于指导PAC的治疗。另一方面,细菌学诊断在改善患者生存预后方面的作用仍有待证实。虽然纤维支气管镜检查对我们来说似乎是一种安全且有用的检查手段,但这些疾病的治疗仍有待明确。我们建议,仅对患有危及生命疾病(Fine评分等于或大于3)的患者或可能感染不常见病原体的患者使用纤维支气管镜检查,这些患者包括:先前使用抗生素无效、患有糖尿病、营养不良、癌症、气流阻塞和吸入性损伤的患者。

相似文献

1
[Acute community-acquired pneumonia of moderate and grave severity investigated by bronchoscopy. Analysis of 193 cases hospitalized in a general hospital].[通过支气管镜检查对中重度急性社区获得性肺炎的研究。对一家综合医院收治的193例患者的分析]
Rev Mal Respir. 1996;13(2):175-82.
2
Severe community-acquired pneumonia: an Australian perspective.重症社区获得性肺炎:澳大利亚视角
Intern Med J. 2005 Dec;35(12):699-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00962.x.
3
The impact on community acquired pneumonia empirical therapy of diagnostic bronchoscopic techniques.诊断性支气管镜技术对社区获得性肺炎经验性治疗的影响。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(4):286-92. doi: 10.1080/00365540701663373.
4
Severe community-acquired pneumonia in Singapore.
Singapore Med J. 1996 Aug;37(4):374-7.
5
[Pneumonias in patients with malignant hemopathies. Their etiology, response to treatment and prognostic factors in 69 patients (88 episodes)].[恶性血液病患者的肺炎。69例患者(88次发作)的病因、治疗反应及预后因素]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Mar 13;112(9):321-5.
6
Usefulness of the Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines for community pneumonia: a retrospective analysis of community-acquired pneumonia between 2000 and 2002 in a general hospital.日本呼吸学会社区肺炎指南的实用性:对一家综合医院2000年至2002年期间社区获得性肺炎的回顾性分析。
Respirology. 2005 Mar;10(2):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00664.x.
7
Community-acquired pneumonia in adults in British hospitals in 1982-1983: a survey of aetiology, mortality, prognostic factors and outcome. The British Thoracic Society and the Public Health Laboratory Service.1982 - 1983年英国医院成人社区获得性肺炎:病因、死亡率、预后因素及转归的调查。英国胸科学会和公共卫生实验室服务部
Q J Med. 1987 Mar;62(239):195-220.
8
[Prospective study of 198 community acquired pneumonias in a general hospital].[一家综合医院198例社区获得性肺炎的前瞻性研究]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1999 May;17(5):213-8.
9
[Community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adult patients. Clinical presentation and prognostic factors].[住院成年患者的社区获得性肺炎。临床表现及预后因素]
Rev Med Chil. 2002 Dec;130(12):1373-82.
10
Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients in Jordan.约旦住院患者社区获得性肺炎的病因
Saudi Med J. 2006 Jun;27(6):813-6.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Med Mal Infect. 1999 Apr;29(4):237-257. doi: 10.1016/S0399-077X(99)80032-8. Epub 2002 Apr 8.
2
[Contribution of microbiological investigations to the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections].微生物学检查对下呼吸道感染诊断的贡献
Med Mal Infect. 2006 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):570-98. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
3
[Definition of low respiratory tract infections].[下呼吸道感染的定义]
Med Mal Infect. 2006 Nov-Dec;36(11-12):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2006.05.014. Epub 2006 Jul 11.