Suppr超能文献

[通过支气管镜检查对中重度急性社区获得性肺炎的研究。对一家综合医院收治的193例患者的分析]

[Acute community-acquired pneumonia of moderate and grave severity investigated by bronchoscopy. Analysis of 193 cases hospitalized in a general hospital].

作者信息

Vivès L, Biel P, Maler G, Labonne F, Lecoules N, Dufour M, Marignol G, Vanche J

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie et Laboratoires Microbiologiques, Centres Hopitaliers Généraux, Saint-Gaudens.

出版信息

Rev Mal Respir. 1996;13(2):175-82.

PMID:8711237
Abstract

Between February 1989 and June 1994 193 cases of acute community acquired pneumonia (PAC) which were of intermediate or great severity were admitted to two hospitals in the South West of France. These patients were explored using bronchofibroscopy (FB) with a protected brush (BP) and alveolar microlavage (MLBA) and quantitative cultures were performed, also there were other specimens taken in a regular fashion. The percentage of positive examinations was 60% for brushings (BP), 59% for MLBA and 21% for blood cultures and 16% for serological tests. An aetiology was determined in 137 cases (70.9%). The organisms recovered were Streptococcus pneumoniae (49.6%), gram negative bacilli (17.4%), Haemophilus influenzae (11.7%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (4.4%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (4.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (3.6%), Chlamydia pneumoniae (2.2%), Legionella pneumophila (0.7%), and various 5.8%. The overall mortality was 15% despite immediate antibiotics based on the likely organism in 88% of cases. The study of prognostic factors confirmed the Fine score system (determined a posteriori) which constitutes a useful and practical index determining the management of PAC. On the other hand the role of bacteriological documentation in improving the vital prognosis remains to be confirmed. If bronchofibroscopy has appeared to us as a safe and useful means of investigation, the management of these disease remains to specified. We suggest that its use is reserved for subjects with life threatening disease (a Fine score equal to or greater than 3) or for those patients who are likely to have unusual germs: failure of previous antibiotics, diabetes, malnourishment, cancer, airflow obstruction and inhalation.

摘要

1989年2月至1994年6月期间,193例中度或重度急性社区获得性肺炎(PAC)患者被收治到法国西南部的两家医院。对这些患者进行了纤维支气管镜检查(FB),使用了防污染毛刷(BP)和肺泡灌洗(MLBA)并进行了定量培养,同时还定期采集了其他标本。毛刷检查(BP)的阳性检出率为60%,肺泡灌洗(MLBA)为59%,血培养为21%,血清学检测为16%。137例(70.9%)患者明确了病因。分离出的病原体有肺炎链球菌(49.6%)、革兰氏阴性杆菌(17.4%)、流感嗜血杆菌(11.7%)、肺炎支原体(4.4%)、结核分枝杆菌(4.4%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(3.6%)、肺炎衣原体(2.2%)、嗜肺军团菌(0.7%)以及其他各种病原体(5.8%)。尽管88%的病例根据可能的病原体立即使用了抗生素,但总体死亡率仍为15%。对预后因素的研究证实了Fine评分系统(事后确定),该系统构成了一个有用且实用的指标,可用于指导PAC的治疗。另一方面,细菌学诊断在改善患者生存预后方面的作用仍有待证实。虽然纤维支气管镜检查对我们来说似乎是一种安全且有用的检查手段,但这些疾病的治疗仍有待明确。我们建议,仅对患有危及生命疾病(Fine评分等于或大于3)的患者或可能感染不常见病原体的患者使用纤维支气管镜检查,这些患者包括:先前使用抗生素无效、患有糖尿病、营养不良、癌症、气流阻塞和吸入性损伤的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验