Jackson D, Raftos M, Mannix J
Nurs Inq. 1996 Jun;3(2):112-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.1996.tb00021.x.
Over the past three years, Australian nurses have witnessed a proliferation of locally published refereed nursing journals. This paper considers the refereed content published in four selected Australian nursing journals over a recent twelve month period. Material appearing in the Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing (AJAN), Contemporary Nurse, Nursing Inquiry and Collegian was categorized according to subject matter and authorship by gender and discipline. Findings indicate that articles pertaining to clinical practice, the practice of research, and professional nursing issues are well represented in the literature. These findings mark a change from earlier analyses of Australian nursing journals, which suggested that the epistemologies of other disciplines were over-represented in Australian nursing journals, and thus exerted a powerful influence over the development of nursing theory and scholarship. The increase in the number of refereed Australian nursing journals is indicative of the dynamic state of Australian nursing, in terms of confidence, scholarship and clinical practice development.
在过去三年里，澳大利亚护士见证了本地出版的经过同行评审的护理期刊数量激增。本文考察了最近十二个月期间在四种选定的澳大利亚护理期刊上发表的经过同行评审的内容。发表在《澳大利亚高级护理杂志》（AJAN）、《当代护士》、《护理探究》和《学院人》上的材料，根据主题以及作者的性别和学科进行了分类。研究结果表明，与临床实践、研究实践和专业护理问题相关的文章在文献中占了很大比例。这些研究结果表明，与早期对澳大利亚护理期刊的分析有所不同，早期分析表明其他学科的认识论在澳大利亚护理期刊中占比过高，从而对护理理论和学术发展产生了强大影响。澳大利亚经过同行评审的护理期刊数量的增加，表明澳大利亚护理行业在信心、学术水平和临床实践发展方面呈现出活跃态势。
