Suppr超能文献

三种巴氏涂片采集方法的随机对照比较。

A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.

作者信息

Kavak Z N, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Marmara University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb02165.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 cervical smear sampling devices for obtaining acceptable yields of endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears. In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, we collected 346 smears over a 6-month period, 110 with the Cervex brush, 125 with the cotton swab plus Ayre spatula and 111 with the Cytobrush plus Ayre spatula. The Cytopathology Laboratory, blinded to the Papanicolaou smear method, screened the smears using the Bethesda system guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using the Pearson X2 and analysis of variance tests. There was an increased detection of endocervical cells in the Cytobrush plus Ayre spatula and the Cervex brush methods, compared with the cotton swab plus Ayre spatula group (p = 2.39 x 10(-6), p = 4.49 x 10(-7) respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the Cytobrush-Ayre spatula and the Cervex brush sampling methods were equally effective in obtaining endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较3种宫颈涂片采样装置在巴氏涂片检查中获取可接受的宫颈管内细胞数量的有效性。在一项随机对照临床试验中,我们在6个月的时间内收集了346份涂片,其中110份使用宫颈刷采集,125份使用棉拭子加艾尔刮板采集,111份使用细胞刷加艾尔刮板采集。细胞病理学实验室在不知道巴氏涂片方法的情况下,按照贝塞斯达系统指南对涂片进行筛查。使用Pearson X2检验和方差分析进行统计分析。与棉拭子加艾尔刮板组相比,细胞刷加艾尔刮板组和宫颈刷法检测到的宫颈管内细胞数量有所增加(分别为p = 2.39 x 10(-6),p = 4.49 x 10(-7))。细胞刷-艾尔刮板法和宫颈刷采样法在获取巴氏涂片中宫颈管内细胞方面同样有效,两者之间无统计学显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验