Suppr超能文献

通过三阶集总模型拟合舒张压会得出不可靠的动脉顺应性估计值。

Fit to diastolic arterial pressure by third-order lumped model yields unreliable estimates of arterial compliance.

作者信息

Fogliardi R, Burattini R, Shroff S G, Campbell K B

机构信息

Department of Electronics and Automatica, University of Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Med Eng Phys. 1996 Apr;18(3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)00042-9.

Abstract

The pressure pulse contour analysis method uses a third-order lumped model to evaluate the elastic properties of the arterial system and their modifications with adaptive responses or disease. A fundamental assumption underlying this method is that the estimates of model parameters (two compliances, an inertance, and a peripheral resistance) obtained from a measurement of cardiac output, and a simultaneous measurement of an arterial pressure, are independent of the pressure measurement site. If true, this hypothesis would provide a minimally invasive method for estimation of arterial compliance. The aim of the present study was to test the validity of this assumption and the ability of the method to assess changes of compliance in response to vasoactive drug administration. In five anaesthetised, open-chest dogs we measured pulsatile pressure and flow in the ascending aorta and pulsatile pressure in the terminal aorta, under basal, vasoconstricted (methoxamine), and vasodilated (sodium nitroprusside) conditions. Model peripheral resistance was assumed equal to the ratio of mean pressure to cardiac output. Estimates of inertance and compliances, and the associated estimation errors, were determined by fitting the model output to either the diastolic portions of ascending aortic pressure, P(adt), or terminal aortic pressure, Ptd(t). Results showed that the assumption of independency of model parameter estimates on the arterial pressure measurement site was not verified. Different images of the vasoactive drug-induced changes in vascular compliance were obtained from fits to P(adt) and Ptd(t). Model parameter estimates were associated with high estimation errors and were very sensitive to the choice of the period of diastolic pressure to be fitted. Model predicted aortic pressure, over the entire heart cycle, did not compare well with experimental ascending aortic pressure. Our results question the reliability of the pressure pulse contour analysis method for evaluating arterial compliance.

摘要

压力脉搏轮廓分析方法使用三阶集总模型来评估动脉系统的弹性特性及其随适应性反应或疾病的变化。该方法的一个基本假设是,从心输出量测量以及同时进行的动脉压测量中获得的模型参数估计值(两个顺应性、一个惯性和一个外周阻力)与压力测量部位无关。如果这一假设成立,那么该假设将为估计动脉顺应性提供一种微创方法。本研究的目的是检验这一假设的有效性以及该方法评估血管活性药物给药后顺应性变化的能力。在五只麻醉开胸犬中,我们测量了基础状态、血管收缩(甲氧明)和血管舒张(硝普钠)状态下升主动脉的脉动压力和流量以及终末主动脉的脉动压力。假设模型外周阻力等于平均压力与心输出量之比。通过将模型输出拟合到升主动脉压力舒张部分P(adt)或终末主动脉压力Ptd(t)来确定惯性和顺应性的估计值以及相关的估计误差。结果表明,模型参数估计值与动脉压测量部位无关这一假设未得到验证。从拟合P(adt)和Ptd(t)中获得了血管活性药物引起的血管顺应性变化的不同图像。模型参数估计值与高估计误差相关,并且对要拟合的舒张压时间段的选择非常敏感。在整个心动周期中,模型预测的主动脉压力与实验测量的升主动脉压力相比效果不佳。我们的结果质疑了压力脉搏轮廓分析方法评估动脉顺应性的可靠性。

相似文献

5
Lumped model of terminal aortic impedance in the dog.犬终末主动脉阻抗的集总模型。
Ann Biomed Eng. 1994 Jul-Aug;22(4):381-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02368244.
6
Determinants of pulse pressure.脉压的决定因素。
Hypertension. 1998 Sep;32(3):556-9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.32.3.556.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验