• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利佛罗伦萨省两项乳腺钼靶筛查项目的成本测算

Measurement of the costs in two mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence, Italy.

作者信息

Zappa M, Spagnolo G, Ciatto S, Giorgi D, Paci E, Rosseli del Turco M

机构信息

Center for the Study and Prevention of Cancer (CSPO), Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):191-4. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200404.

DOI:10.1177/096914139500200404
PMID:8719147
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate and to compare the cost per woman examined and per breast cancer detected in two mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence.

SETTING

Two ongoing, population based, mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence. The first (district project) was started in the seventies in a rural area, whereas the second (city project) was started in the city at the end of 1990.

METHODS

All relevant resources consumed by the programmes (costs) were listed and measured. The costs are related to 1993. The unit cost for each phase (recruitment, screening, assessment) of the screening process was estimated by dividing the total cost of the phase by the number of women examined. The cost per cancer detected was obtained by dividing the total cost of the programme by the number of cancers detected at screening.

RESULTS

The costs per woman examined were $38.1 and $41.1 in the district and city programmes respectively. The cost per breast cancer detected was $7424 in the district programme and $5180 in the city programme. Staff accounted for more than 50% of the total cost. The unit cost in the screening phase was higher in the district programme, whereas it was lower in the assessment phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are consistent with, although slightly lower than, published estimates of the cost per woman screened. Important parameters for determining the efficiency of a mammographic screening programme are the compliance rate and the recall rate.

摘要

目的

评估并比较佛罗伦萨省两个乳腺钼靶筛查项目中每位接受检查女性的成本以及每例检测出的乳腺癌成本。

背景

佛罗伦萨省两个正在进行的、基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查项目。第一个(地区项目)于七十年代在农村地区启动,而第二个(城市项目)于1990年底在城市启动。

方法

列出并衡量项目消耗的所有相关资源(成本)。成本与1993年相关。通过将筛查过程各阶段(招募、筛查、评估)的总成本除以接受检查的女性人数来估算各阶段的单位成本。通过将项目总成本除以筛查时检测出的癌症病例数来得出每例检测出的癌症成本。

结果

地区项目和城市项目中每位接受检查女性的成本分别为38.1美元和41.1美元。地区项目中每例检测出的乳腺癌成本为7424美元,城市项目中为5180美元。工作人员成本占总成本的比例超过50%。地区项目筛查阶段的单位成本较高,而评估阶段的单位成本较低。

结论

我们的结果与已发表的每位接受筛查女性成本的估计值相符,尽管略低。确定乳腺钼靶筛查项目效率的重要参数是依从率和召回率。

相似文献

1
Measurement of the costs in two mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence, Italy.意大利佛罗伦萨省两项乳腺钼靶筛查项目的成本测算
J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):191-4. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200404.
2
Assessment of lesions detected at mammographic screening: performance at first or repeat screening in the Florence programme.乳腺钼靶筛查中检测到的病变评估:佛罗伦萨项目首次或重复筛查时的表现
J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):188-92. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100311.
3
Mammographic screening: measurement of the cost in a population based programme in Victoria, Australia.乳腺钼靶筛查:澳大利亚维多利亚州一项基于人群的项目中的成本测算
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Aug;48(4):391-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.4.391.
4
The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.新西兰乳腺钼靶筛查的成本:来自试点项目的证据。
N Z Med J. 1994 Dec 14;107(991):501-3.
5
[Evaluation of the costs of mammographic screening program in the city of Florence].[佛罗伦萨市乳腺钼靶筛查项目成本评估]
Epidemiol Prev. 1995 Dec;19(65):330-7.
6
Independent double reading of screening mammograms.乳腺筛查钼靶片的独立双人阅片。
J Med Screen. 1995;2(2):99-101. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200209.
7
Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.乳房X线筛查:伦敦地区双视图与单视图检查程序的增量成本效益分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):70-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.70.
8
Measurement of the cost of screening for cervical cancer in the district of Florence, Italy.意大利佛罗伦萨地区宫颈癌筛查成本的测算。
Tumori. 1998 Nov-Dec;84(6):631-5. doi: 10.1177/030089169808400603.
9
Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography.低成本乳腺筛查的诱导成本。
Radiology. 1988 Sep;168(3):661-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.3.3406395.
10
[Reference standards in the performance of a mammographic screening program. Results of the screening program in the province of Florence, 1992].[乳腺钼靶筛查项目实施中的参考标准。1992年佛罗伦萨省筛查项目结果]
Radiol Med. 1993 Oct;86(4):467-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound in Dense and Nondense Breasts.在致密型和非致密型乳腺中使用数字乳腺断层合成和超声减少不必要的活检。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 4;29(8):5508-5516. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080435.
2
Benefits of double reading of screening mammograms: retrospective study on a consecutive series.筛查性乳房 X 光照片的双重读取的益处:连续系列的回顾性研究。
Radiol Med. 2011 Jun;116(4):575-83. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0656-y. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
On the role of arbitration of discordant double readings of screening mammography: experience from two Italian programmes.
探讨有争议的乳腺 X 光筛查双读结果仲裁的作用:来自两个意大利项目的经验。
Radiol Med. 2011 Feb;116(1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0606-0. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
4
The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution.过度诊断的噩梦:是时候谨慎了。
BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 16;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-34.