van Grunsven P M, Dompeling E, van Schayck C P, Molema J, Folgering H, van Weel C
Department of General Practice, Nijmegen University, Netherlands.
Fam Med. 1996 Jan;28(1):46-51.
This study investigated if long-term therapy with inhaled corticosteroids could be discontinued in mild asthma when patients are in a clinically stable phase of the disease. Data were derived from a 2-year randomized, controlled, bronchodilator intervention study in family practice.
The experimental (stop-steroid) group consisted of 19 asthmatic patients who had used inhaled corticosteroids daily during at least the year preceding this study and who stopped using these drugs because of participation in the bronchodilator intervention study. The control (no-steroid) group consisted of 70 patients with asthma who had not used corticosteroids in the year preceding the study. At the start of the study (8 weeks after stopping steroids), the two groups were completely comparable in all other relevant characteristics. During the 2-year study, patients were treated only with a bronchodilator (salbutamol or ipratropium bromide). Outcome measures were: exacerbations, symptoms, annual decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), annual change in nonspecific bronchial responsiveness (PC20-histamine), and the need for additional corticosteroid therapy because of symptoms of increased airway obstruction.
In the stop-steroid group, 12 of 19 patients (63%) dropped out during the study period because of a deterioration of their clinical condition and need for additional (inhaled) corticosteroid treatment. In the no-steroid group, only eight patients dropped out for this reason (11%). In the stop-steroid group, who did not use steroids for at least 1 year, the annual FEV1 decline was much larger than in the comparison subjects (165 vs 40 ml/yr).
Stopping maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids may not be advisable in all patients with mild asthma. Instead of stopping or interrupting treatment, family physicians are advised to determine the minimal effective daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids for each individual patient that provides adequate control of the disease.
本研究调查了在轻度哮喘患者处于疾病临床稳定期时,吸入性糖皮质激素的长期治疗是否可以停用。数据来自一项在家庭医疗中进行的为期2年的随机、对照、支气管扩张剂干预研究。
试验组(停用类固醇组)由19名哮喘患者组成,这些患者在本研究前至少一年每天使用吸入性糖皮质激素,并且由于参与支气管扩张剂干预研究而停止使用这些药物。对照组(未使用类固醇组)由70名哮喘患者组成,这些患者在研究前一年未使用过糖皮质激素。在研究开始时(停用类固醇8周后),两组在所有其他相关特征方面完全可比。在为期2年的研究中,患者仅接受支气管扩张剂(沙丁胺醇或异丙托溴铵)治疗。观察指标包括:病情加重情况、症状、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)的年下降幅度、非特异性支气管反应性(组胺激发试验PC20)的年度变化,以及因气道阻塞症状加重而需要额外使用糖皮质激素治疗的情况。
在停用类固醇组中,19名患者中有12名(63%)在研究期间因临床状况恶化和需要额外(吸入)糖皮质激素治疗而退出。在未使用类固醇组中,仅有8名患者因此原因退出(11%)。在至少1年未使用类固醇的停用类固醇组中,FEV1的年下降幅度远大于对照组(分别为165 vs 40 ml/年)。
并非所有轻度哮喘患者都适合停用吸入性糖皮质激素维持治疗。建议家庭医生不要停止或中断治疗,而是为每位患者确定能充分控制疾病的吸入性糖皮质激素的最小有效日剂量。