• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能力评估:随访时的看法

Competency assessments: perceptions at follow-up.

作者信息

Carlin K, Silberfeld M, Deber R B, Lowy F

机构信息

Competency Clinic, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;41(3):167-74. doi: 10.1177/070674379604100307.

DOI:10.1177/070674379604100307
PMID:8722646
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report on the perceptions of assessment of competency and its consequences on a group of clients and significant others at follow-up.

METHODS

Ninety-five interviews were conducted using a carefully developed semistructured telephone interview of 24 clients and 71 family/caregivers, representing the perceptions of about 80 clients.

RESULTS

There was general satisfaction in the competency assessment process. There was a perception that interests and rights were protected. Clients were seen to be less involved in all spheres of decision making regardless of capacity outcome. Clients and families were satisfied with how decisions were made.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up study of competency assessment does not support the conclusions previously drawn based on court record studies that assessments are deleterious and frequently result in violations of rights.

摘要

目的

报告对能力评估的看法及其对一组随访客户和重要他人的影响。

方法

采用精心设计的半结构化电话访谈对24名客户和71名家庭/照顾者进行了95次访谈,代表了约80名客户的看法。

结果

对能力评估过程总体满意。认为利益和权利得到了保护。无论能力评估结果如何,客户在所有决策领域的参与度都较低。客户和家庭对决策方式感到满意。

结论

能力评估的随访研究不支持先前基于法庭记录研究所得出的结论,即评估是有害的,并且经常导致权利侵犯。

相似文献

1
Competency assessments: perceptions at follow-up.能力评估:随访时的看法
Can J Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;41(3):167-74. doi: 10.1177/070674379604100307.
2
[The imperious need to create evaluation centers for criminologic expert assessment].[创建犯罪学专家评估评估中心的迫切需求]
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1995 Nov;153(9):597-600.
3
[Legal counselling and depression - the experience of a legal advisor].[法律咨询与抑郁症——一位法律顾问的经历]
Encephale. 2011 Jun;37(3):241-3. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 May 23.
4
Protecting mental health clients' dignity - the importance of legal control.保护精神健康客户的尊严 - 法律控制的重要性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
5
[Medical expert assessment in psychiatry].[精神病学中的医学专家评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):623-6.
6
A noncompliant patient with fluctuating capacity.一名能力波动的不依从患者。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;20(5):317-24. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00034-6.
7
Procedural and material aspects of the protection of the rights of a person subject to proceedings for legal incapacitation - Part II.针对无行为能力法律程序当事人权利保护的程序及实体方面——第二部分。
Psychiatr Pol. 2019 Feb 28;53(1):177-189. doi: 10.12740/PP/93006.
8
[Mental incapacity and incapacity to make a decision and their status for determining legal guardianship].[精神无行为能力和无能力做出决定及其在确定法定监护权方面的地位]
Nervenarzt. 2002 May;73(5):478-80. doi: 10.1007/s001150101188.
9
[Comments on the article, "Mental disability and incompetence to make decisions and correlation with legal guardianship"].[对文章《精神残疾与决策能力欠缺及与法定监护的相关性》的评论]
Nervenarzt. 2002 Nov;73(11):1119-20; author reply 1121-2. doi: 10.1007/s00115-002-1382-4.
10
Dementia and legal competency.痴呆与法律行为能力。
Coll Antropol. 2011 Jun;35(2):463-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention for HIV-seropositive persons: successive approximation toward a new identity.针对HIV血清阳性者的预防:逐步接近新身份认同。
Behav Modif. 2005 Mar;29(2):227-55. doi: 10.1177/0145445504272599.
2
Faulty judgment, expert opinion, and decision-making capacity.
Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Aug;20(4):377-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1009980228440.