Anton-Culver H, Kurosaki T, Taylor T H, Gildea M, Brunner D, Bringman D
Epidemiology Division, University of California, Irvine 92717-7550, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(2):193-205. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:2<193::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO;2-9.
A major risk factor for breast cancer is family history of the disease in first-degree relatives. This study evaluates the validity of family history information on breast cancer in mothers and sisters of breast cancer probands from the cancer registry (CR) compared to personal interviews (PI) of 359 consecutive population-based cases of breast cancer. Breast cancer is seen in mothers of 14% of probands by CR compared to 12% by PI. Further, 13% of probands have a sister with breast cancer using CR compared to 12% by PI. Using PI as the standard, the sensitivity of the CR family history data in mothers is 92% and the specificity is 99%, while in sisters they are 88% and 99%, respectively. These estimates were calculated on cases where family history information is available in the CR. Sensitivity and specificity are recalculated, recording an "error" whenever family history information is not available, and they are 75% and 68%, respectively, for mothers and 72% and 70%, respectively, for sisters. Estimates of proband-mother and proband-sisters familial breast cancer from CR and PI are sufficiently similar to warrant the use of CR family history data in studies of genetic epidemiology. The family phenotype consistent with the BRCA1 syndrome was found in four (1.1%) probands, all below age 50 years, while for BRCA2 there were five (1.4%) probands, three below age 50 years and two 50 years or older. Site-specific familial breast cancer was found in 23 (6.4%) probands. Population-based multiple-case breast cancer families can rapidly be identified through CR. These families can make substantial contributions to the study of genetic and environmental etiology of the disease as well as benefit from preventive and therapeutic efforts. As new knowledge and tools in molecular genetics become available, there is an urgent need for large population-based registries of families at high risk for cancer.
乳腺癌的一个主要风险因素是一级亲属中有该病的家族病史。本研究评估了癌症登记处(CR)中乳腺癌先证者的母亲和姐妹关于乳腺癌家族病史信息的有效性,并与对359例连续的基于人群的乳腺癌病例进行的个人访谈(PI)进行了比较。通过CR发现,14%的先证者母亲患有乳腺癌,而通过PI发现这一比例为12%。此外,通过CR发现,13%的先证者有患乳腺癌的姐妹,而通过PI发现这一比例为12%。以PI为标准,CR中母亲家族病史数据的敏感性为92%,特异性为99%,而姐妹的敏感性和特异性分别为88%和99%。这些估计值是根据CR中有家族病史信息的病例计算得出的。每当没有家族病史信息时就记录为“错误”,重新计算敏感性和特异性,母亲的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和68%,姐妹的敏感性和特异性分别为72%和70%。CR和PI对先证者母亲和先证者姐妹家族性乳腺癌的估计值足够相似,足以保证在遗传流行病学研究中使用CR家族病史数据。在4名(1.1%)先证者中发现了与BRCA1综合征一致的家族表型,所有患者年龄均在50岁以下,而对于BRCA2,有5名(1.4%)先证者,3名年龄在50岁以下,2名年龄在50岁及以上。在23名(6.4%)先证者中发现了特定部位的家族性乳腺癌。通过CR可以快速识别基于人群的多病例乳腺癌家族。这些家族可以为该疾病的遗传和环境病因学研究做出重大贡献,同时也能从预防和治疗措施中受益。随着分子遗传学新知识和工具的出现,迫切需要建立基于人群的高危癌症家族大型登记处。