Deloche G, Hannequin D, Dordain M, Perrier D, Pichard B, Quint S, Metz-Lutz M N, Kremin H, Cardebat D
Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France.
Brain Lang. 1996 Apr;53(1):105-20. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0039.
Oral confrontation naming was compared in 108 normal subjects controlled for education, age, and gender and in 18 aphasic patients for the same set of 115 pictures. Demographic variables influenced both normals' and aphasics' performance. However, the nature of aphasics' misnamings on the one hand and the differential effects of characteristics of pictures and words on normals' and aphasics' responses on the other indicated specific deficits in patients. The classical hypothesis that aphasics' misnamings and the production of word associations by normals should rely on similar mechanisms (Rinnert & Whitaker, 1973) is questioned. Nondominant responses observed in normals accounted for a larger proportion of verbal errors than associates to target words.
对108名在教育程度、年龄和性别方面匹配的正常受试者以及18名失语症患者针对同一组115张图片进行了口语对答命名测试。人口统计学变量对正常人和失语症患者的表现均有影响。然而，一方面失语症患者错命名的性质，另一方面图片和单词特征对正常人和失语症患者反应的不同影响，均表明患者存在特定缺陷。经典假说认为，失语症患者的错命名和正常人产生单词联想应依赖相似机制（Rinnert & Whitaker，1973），这一假说受到质疑。在正常人中观察到的非主导反应在言语错误中所占比例高于对目标词的联想。
