• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Crime, psychiatry and the insanity defence: a report on some recent reforms in the United States.

作者信息

Brakel S J, Cavanaugh J L

机构信息

Isaac Ray Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1996 Feb;30(1):134-41. doi: 10.3109/00048679609076083.

DOI:10.3109/00048679609076083
PMID:8724336
Abstract

There have been substantial developments in mental health law in the United States over the last 10-15 years. Once focal point has been the insanity defence, discussed here. The operational consequences of the legal changes remain to be assessed empirically, but informed speculation is possible. Both a description of the reforms and the assessment of their potential effect are relevant to members of the psychiatric profession in Australia, whether they be forensic specialists or traditional practitioners or researchers. Selective consideration of the American experience, as opposed to contemplating Wholesale transposition, is the appropriate posture for Australian policymakers.

摘要

相似文献

1
Crime, psychiatry and the insanity defence: a report on some recent reforms in the United States.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1996 Feb;30(1):134-41. doi: 10.3109/00048679609076083.
2
An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.与精神错乱罪犯相关的法律介绍。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2004;14 Suppl 1:S12-8. doi: 10.1002/cbm.603.
3
Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge.受审能力与指控的严重性。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):458-65.
4
Commentary: UK perspective on competency to stand trial.评论:英国对受审能力的看法。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):466-71.
5
Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.德国刑事司法系统中的法医精神病学专家证人
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(2):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
6
Adjudicating pathological criminal incapacity within a climate of ultimate issue barriers: a comparative perspective.在终极问题障碍的背景下裁定病理性犯罪无行为能力:一个比较性视角
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;38:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
7
[Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].[责任的精神病学专业知识差异:通过文献综述进行评估和初步假设]
Encephale. 2015 Jun;41(3):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
8
[Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].[现代分类系统的发展及其对法医精神病学专家评估的影响]
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Dec;56(12):652-6.
9
[Ethical problems of insanity].[精神错乱的伦理问题]
Psychiatr Pol. 1991 May-Aug;25(3-4):119-24.
10
Forensic psychiatric testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence.依据《联邦证据规则》提供的法医精神病学证词。
Leg Med. 1995:241-60.