Farr G, Acosta Castro L A, DiSantostefano R, Claassen E, Olguin F
Family Health International, Research triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Sex Transm Dis. 1996 May-Jun;23(3):206-12. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199605000-00008.
Condom use is one of the most important preventive measures sex workers can take to reduce the risk of becoming infected with a sexually transmitted disease. However, a client may refuse to use a condom when requested. Some sexually transmitted disease prevention programs are recommending that sex workers use spermicide as an alternative prophylaxis when a condom is refused, yet little is known about the effect of this recommendation on prophylactic condom use.
To determine if using spermicide, either in conjunction with condoms or as a backup, influenced overall condom use among a group of sex workers at high risk of sexually transmitted diseases in Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia.
Participants were assigned randomly to one of three condom use groups: use of condoms only (Condoms Only), use of condoms and spermicides concurrently (Condom and Spermicide), or use of spermicide when condoms were refused (Spermicide as a Backup). A total of 199 sex workers entered the study and were asked to return for follow-up every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
Women assigned to the Spermicide as a Backup group used a condom for an average of 78.1% of their reported acts of intercourse, compared with an average of 94.5% in the Condom Only and 92.3% in the Condom and Spermicide groups. However, women in the Spermicide as a Backup group used a condom or spermicide for an average of 96.9% of their acts of intercourse. Condoms were used for every intercourse act by less than 5% of the women in the Spermicide as a Backup groups, compared with 50.7% in the Condom Only group and 41.2% in the Condom and Spermicide group (P 0.001). When condoms were not used, client refusal was the primary reason reported. The incidence of sexually transmitted diseases and other urogenital inflammations in all groups was lower than expected.
Among Colombian sex workers, condom use declined substantially when women were instructed to use spermicides if they were unable to persuade their partner to use a condom. However, these same women usually used the study spermicide as an alternate prophylaxis.
使用避孕套是性工作者降低感染性传播疾病风险可采取的最重要预防措施之一。然而,当被要求使用时,嫖客可能会拒绝。一些性传播疾病预防项目建议,当避孕套被拒绝时,性工作者使用杀精剂作为替代预防措施,但对于这一建议对预防性使用避孕套的影响知之甚少。
确定在哥伦比亚波哥大圣菲地区,将杀精剂与避孕套联合使用或作为备用措施,是否会影响一组性传播疾病高风险的性工作者的整体避孕套使用情况。
参与者被随机分配到三个避孕套使用组之一:仅使用避孕套组(仅用避孕套组)、同时使用避孕套和杀精剂组(避孕套与杀精剂组),或在避孕套被拒绝时使用杀精剂组(杀精剂备用组)。共有199名性工作者进入研究,并被要求每2周回来随访一次,为期12周。
被分配到杀精剂备用组的女性,据报告她们性行为中平均78.1%的情况使用了避孕套,相比之下,仅用避孕套组平均为94.5%,避孕套与杀精剂组平均为92.3%。然而,杀精剂备用组的女性性行为中平均96.9%的情况使用了避孕套或杀精剂。杀精剂备用组中不到5%的女性每次性行为都使用避孕套,相比之下,仅用避孕套组为50.7%,避孕套与杀精剂组为41.2%(P<0.001)。当未使用避孕套时,嫖客拒绝是报告的主要原因。所有组中性传播疾病和其他泌尿生殖系统炎症的发病率低于预期。
在哥伦比亚性工作者中,如果女性无法说服其伴侣使用避孕套而被指示使用杀精剂时,避孕套的使用大幅下降。然而,这些女性通常将研究中的杀精剂用作替代预防措施。