Mérette C, Ott J
Centre de Recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, Beauport, Quebec, Canada.
Am J Med Genet. 1996 May 17;63(2):386-91. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960517)63:2<386::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO;2-G.
In linkage analysis of recessive traits, parental relationship is important. For the case that it is unknown, the question is investigated as to whether estimating parental relationship and using the estimated relationship in linkage analysis is beneficial. Results show that estimating parental relationship can reliably be carried out on the basis of 50-100 genetic marker loci (analysis based on theory by Thompson [1975: Am J Hum Genet 39:173-188]). Misspecification of parental relationship leads to a loss of linkage informativeness, but not to false-positive evidence for linkage. An asymptotic bias in the recombination fraction estimate occurs when parents are unrelated and falsely taken to be related, but no such bias is seen when related parents are taken to be unrelated. Results from this investigation suggest that an estimated parental relationship may be used in linkage analysis as if it were the correct relationship, when evidence for the estimated relationship is supported by a likelihood ratio of at least 10:1 against the parents being unrelated.
在隐性性状的连锁分析中,亲本关系很重要。对于亲本关系未知的情况,研究了在连锁分析中估计亲本关系并使用估计的关系是否有益。结果表明,基于50 - 100个遗传标记位点能够可靠地估计亲本关系(基于Thompson [1975: 《美国人类遗传学杂志》39:173 - 188]的理论分析)。亲本关系的错误指定会导致连锁信息性的丧失,但不会导致连锁的假阳性证据。当父母无亲缘关系却被错误地认定为有亲缘关系时,重组率估计会出现渐近偏差,但当有亲缘关系的父母被认定为无亲缘关系时则不会出现这种偏差。本研究结果表明,当支持估计关系的似然比至少为10:1(反对父母无亲缘关系)时,估计的亲本关系可用于连锁分析,就好像它是正确的关系一样。