Smith T D, Thomas T R, Londeree B R, Zhang Q, Ziogas G
Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.
Can J Appl Physiol. 1996 Apr;21(2):79-89. doi: 10.1139/h96-008.
In order to compare responses on six modes of exercise for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and ventilatory thresholds (VT-1, VT-2), 10 male recreational exercisers (23 +/- 3 yrs) completed incremental maximal tests on treadmill, stationary skier, shuffle skier, stepper, stationary cycle, and rower. After extensive habituation, VO2peak, VT-1, and VT-2 were determined during each maximal bout. A MANOVA followed by ANOVAs, Tukey post hoc tests, and noncentral F tests indicated that the treadmill elicited a significantly higher peak oxygen consumption than did the other modes, and the skier and stepper values were higher than the rower. VO2 at VT-1 was higher on the treadmill than cycle. The treadmill also elicited a higher VO2 at VT-2 than the shuffle skier, cycle, and rower. However, no differences were observed among modes for VT-1 and VT-2 when expressed as a percentage of VO2peak. These results suggest that the treadmill elicits a higher aerobic capacity measure than other modes, but the ventilatory threshold responses (% VO2peak) are similar among modes.
为了比较10名男性休闲锻炼者(23±3岁)在六种运动模式下的最大摄氧量(VO2peak)和通气阈(VT-1、VT-2)反应,他们在跑步机、固定滑雪机、滑行滑雪机、踏步机、固定自行车和划船机上完成了递增式最大测试。经过充分适应后,在每次最大运动期间测定VO2peak、VT-1和VT-2。一项多变量方差分析(MANOVA),随后进行方差分析(ANOVA)、Tukey事后检验和非中心F检验,结果表明,跑步机所引发的最大摄氧量显著高于其他运动模式,滑雪机和踏步机测得的值高于划船机。VT-1时跑步机上的摄氧量高于固定自行车。跑步机在VT-2时引发的摄氧量也高于滑行滑雪机、固定自行车和划船机。然而,当以VO2peak的百分比表示时,各运动模式在VT-1和VT-2方面未观察到差异。这些结果表明,跑步机比其他运动模式能引发更高的有氧能力指标,但各运动模式的通气阈反应(%VO2peak)相似。