Londeree B R, Thomas T R, Ziogas G, Smith T D, Zhang Q
Department of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Mar;27(3):458-61.
The purpose of the study was to compare the %VO2max versus %HRmax regression equations developed from data collected during incremental work on six exercise modes: treadmill (T), cycle (C), skier (S), shuffle skier (SS), stepper (ST), and rower (R). Ten active males were habituated to all modes and then performed an incremental test to maximum on each mode. Mode order was assigned by Latin square sequences and the tests were separated by at least 72 h. VO2 and HR were recorded at each increment. Regression analyses were performed using SAS-GLM. Regressions for T, S, SS, and ST were not significantly different. C had a lower intercept and higher slope, while R had a higher intercept and lower slope than the other exercise modes. These results suggest that weight bearing exercise modes have similar %VO2max-%HRmax regressions. However, weight supported and arm exercise modes appear to have different regressions.
本研究的目的是比较通过六种运动模式(跑步机(T)、自行车(C)、滑雪机(S)、变速滑雪机(SS)、踏步机(ST)和划船机(R))在递增运动过程中收集的数据所建立的最大摄氧量百分比(%VO2max)与最大心率百分比(%HRmax)的回归方程。十名活跃男性熟悉了所有运动模式,然后在每种模式下进行递增至最大强度的测试。运动模式顺序由拉丁方序列确定,测试之间至少间隔72小时。在每次递增时记录摄氧量(VO2)和心率(HR)。使用SAS通用线性模型(SAS-GLM)进行回归分析。跑步机、滑雪机、变速滑雪机和踏步机的回归无显著差异。与其他运动模式相比,自行车的截距较低、斜率较高,而划船机的截距较高、斜率较低。这些结果表明,负重运动模式具有相似的最大摄氧量百分比-最大心率百分比回归。然而,非负重和上肢运动模式似乎具有不同的回归。