O'Shea E, Kennelly B
Department of Economics, University College Galway, Ireland.
Int J Rehabil Res. 1996 Mar;19(1):13-26. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199603000-00002.
People with disabilities are routinely denied the exercise of choice in their daily lives. There are strong efficiency arguments for the promotion of greater choice and autonomy for disabled people. There are equally strong moral arguments for an investment in the capabilities of disabled people to allow them to participate in both the educational system and the labour market. This investment will not come cheaply nor will the pay-off always be of such magnitude to justify the expenditure on narrow cost-benefit criteria. Those who value efficiency above everything else must, however, set out the system of justice implied by such a choice. The conclusions of a narrow efficiency argument may turn out to be unacceptable to the majority of citizens. Likewise, however, those who value equity at all costs must consider the implications of their approach for individual freedom, economic growth and technical efficiency. This paper is an attempt to explore the meaning of efficiency and equity in the context of independent-living programmes for people with disabilities.
残疾人在日常生活中常常被剥夺选择权。有充分的效率论据支持为残疾人提供更多选择和自主权。同样,也有强有力的道德论据支持投资于残疾人的能力,使他们能够参与教育体系和劳动力市场。这项投资成本不低,回报也不一定总能达到仅依据狭义成本效益标准来证明支出合理的程度。然而,那些将效率置于一切之上的人必须阐明这种选择所隐含的正义体系。狭义效率论据得出的结论可能会被大多数公民认为不可接受。同样,那些不惜一切代价重视公平的人也必须考虑其做法对个人自由、经济增长和技术效率的影响。本文试图在残疾人独立生活项目的背景下探讨效率与公平的意义。