Yelin E, Mathias S D, Buesching D P, Rowland C, Calucin R Q, Fifer S
Medicine and Health Policy, University of California, San Francisco 94109, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Apr;42(7):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00297-9.
Anxiety is a common, though often unrecognized, problem in primary care settings. This study examines the effect on employment of an intervention designed to attune primary care physicians to previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety. Primary care physicians in a mixed-model health maintenance organization (HMO) were randomized by practice site to groups with (intervention) and without (usual care) intensive one-on-one education about anxiety and periodic feedback about their patients with anxiety. All persons 21-65 years of age presenting to the offices of these primary care providers were screened for anxiety with the SCL-90-R on two occasions. Those meeting the SCL-90-R cutpoints for anxiety and whose medical records provided no evidence of recognition or treatment for a mental health condition within the last 6 months were eligible for the study (n = 637). Of these, 573 (90%) completed two follow-up assessments. The present study evaluates the impact of the intervention aimed at the primary care physicians on the labor force participation rate of the persons with anxiety after 5 months of follow-up. The study also evaluates the impact of the intervention on hours of work and the presence of days spent in bed among the persons with anxiety working at the baseline interview and after 5 months. At baseline, the patients of intervention and usual care physicians with previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety did not differ in labor force participation rates. At the conclusion of the study, the patients of the intervention group physicians had significantly lower rates of labor force participation than those of the usual care group physicians. Among those working both at the beginning and conclusion of the study, the intervention had no impact on hours of work or the presence of days spent in bed. We conclude that attuning physicians may reduce labor force participation rates.
焦虑是基层医疗环境中常见但往往未被识别的问题。本研究探讨了一项干预措施对就业的影响,该干预旨在使基层医疗医生关注此前未被识别和治疗的焦虑症。在一个混合模式的健康维护组织(HMO)中,基层医疗医生按执业地点被随机分为两组,一组接受关于焦虑症的强化一对一教育及针对其焦虑症患者的定期反馈(干预组),另一组不接受(常规护理组)。所有21至65岁到这些基层医疗服务提供者办公室就诊的人员,均使用症状自评量表90修订版(SCL - 90 - R)进行了两次焦虑筛查。那些达到SCL - 90 - R焦虑症切点且其病历在过去6个月内无精神健康状况被识别或治疗证据的人员有资格参与本研究(n = 637)。其中,573人(90%)完成了两次随访评估。本研究评估了针对基层医疗医生的干预措施在随访5个月后对焦虑症患者劳动力参与率的影响。该研究还评估了干预措施对在基线访谈时以及5个月后仍在工作的焦虑症患者的工作时长和卧床天数的影响。在基线时,干预组和常规护理组中此前未被识别和治疗的焦虑症患者在劳动力参与率方面并无差异。在研究结束时,干预组医生的患者劳动力参与率显著低于常规护理组医生的患者。在研究开始和结束时均在工作的人员中,干预措施对工作时长或卧床天数没有影响。我们得出结论,使医生关注这一问题可能会降低劳动力参与率。