Jordan S L, Stowers M F, Trawick E G, Theis A B
Union Carbide Corporation, Bound Brook, NJ 08805, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 1996 Apr;24(2):67-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(96)90001-2.
Six different gloves were tested with five different aqueous glutaraldehyde formulations to determine each glove's resistance to permeation. When tested against 2% or 3.4% glutaraldehyde solutions, nitrile rubber, butyl rubber, a synthetic surgical glove, and polyethylene were each impermeable for at least 4 hours. The two latex gloves tested showed glutaraldehyde breakthrough at 45 minutes. When the latex gloves were doubled, the time to first breakthrough increased to 3 to 4 hours. With 50% glutaraldehyde, only butyl rubber and nitrile rubber were impermeable for extended periods. The surgical synthetic glove had breakthrough at 1 hour, whereas polyethylene and the two latex gloves had breakthrough in less than 1 hour.
用五种不同的戊二醛水性制剂对六种不同的手套进行了测试,以确定每种手套的抗渗透能力。当与2%或3.4%的戊二醛溶液进行测试时,丁腈橡胶、丁基橡胶、一种合成手术手套和聚乙烯至少4小时均不可渗透。测试的两种乳胶手套在45分钟时出现戊二醛穿透。当乳胶手套加倍时,首次穿透时间增加到3至4小时。对于50%的戊二醛,只有丁基橡胶和丁腈橡胶能长时间不可渗透。合成手术手套在1小时时出现穿透,而聚乙烯和两种乳胶手套在不到1小时时就出现了穿透。