Edwards S D
Centre for Philosophy and Health Care, University of Wales, Swansea.
J Med Ethics. 1996 Apr;22(2):90-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.2.90.
This paper enquires into the nature and the extent of the obligations of nurses. It is argued that nurses appear to be obliged to undertake supererogatory acts if they take clause one of the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (UKCC) Code of Professional Conduct seriously (as, indeed, they are required to do). In the first part of the paper, the nature of nursing obligations is outlined, and then the groups and individuals to whom nurses have obligations are identified. Following a brief discussion of the moral foundation of the nurse's obligations to her/his employer, a common conflict of obligations is identified. Then a distinction is drawn between ordinary and extraordinary moral standards. Appreciation of this is necessary for an understanding of the criterion of what constitutes a supererogatory act. By the definition of supererogatory acts proposed below, it is suggested that actions such as whistleblowing satisfy that definition.
本文探讨了护士义务的性质和范围。有人认为,如果护士认真对待英国护理、助产与健康访视中央委员会(UKCC)职业行为准则的第一条(实际上他们也被要求这样做),那么他们似乎有义务去承担一些分外之事。在本文的第一部分,概述了护理义务的性质,然后确定了护士对其负有义务的群体和个人。在简要讨论了护士对雇主的义务的道德基础之后,识别出了一种常见的义务冲突。接着区分了普通道德标准和超常道德标准。理解这一点对于理解构成分外之事行为的标准是必要的。根据下面提出的分外之事行为的定义,有人认为诸如揭发之类的行为符合该定义。